Controversial - the place to discuss controversial topics

466 readers

1 users here now

Controversial - the community to discuss controversial topics.

Challenge others opinions and be challenged on your own.

This is not a safe space nor an echo-chamber, you come here to discuss in a civilized way, no flaming, no insults!

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, "trust me bro" is not a valid argument.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

-2

submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/controversial

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Genuine question I had ever since I saw the ai data training controversy. I just remembered it again so I decided to post it here.

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

No. People training AI don't care about ownership.

[–] wildbus8979 9 points 3 days ago

How would that work? Since AI ingestion doesn't care about copyright, why would they care about a legally meaningless digital signature?

[–] ryedaft 7 points 3 days ago

No.

NFTs do not change copyright law.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Could you explain how that would have worked?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

It would be the ultimate irony if the ai horseshit is giving nfts a renaissance, which are the previous iteration of tech horseshit.