this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
391 points (99.0% liked)

politics

24428 readers
2221 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Trump administration confirmed Tuesday that it has sent formal letters to multiple countries, reminding them to submit their "best offers" on trade negotiations ahead of a fast-approaching deadline.

"The president expects good deals, and we are on track for that," Leavitt said, insisting that U.S. officials are in active talks with many key trading partners around the world.

But the need for a "friendly reminder" has fueled skepticism regarding the administration's claims that the aggressive tariffs have motivated trading partners to negotiate deals with the US. Social media users accused the administration of approaching desperation as the deadline approaches.

top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 85 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Why bother to respond when Trump always chickens out?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It will be hilarious if there's discussion of a federal tax on the sale of tacos.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Or an executive order forcing Taco Bell to change its name

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

I have some suggestions:

Trump Wins at All Times

Trump Will Innovate Technology

Trump Is Triumphant

Trump Only Assists the Deserving

Sensible Leadership Overcomes Barriers

Trump Heals Us Greatly

We Are Noble Knights

Supreme Commander of the Ultimate Mission

Tell me this wouldn't work.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Taco Bell marketing should be leaning hard into this. It's a gold mine waiting to be exploited.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

They can't call trump out specifically, but they can really imply it cleverly to give themselves plausible deniability:

Taco Bell presents the Taco47:

  • Doritos Loco Taco shell with artificial bright orange nacho cheese dust flavoring
  • Grilled chicken that has a tendency to fall out. Resulting in a "chicken out" situation, as always.
  • Too much sour creme ruining the meal
  • Served with Diet Coke only, but with way too much ICE

Cost is 75 cents each, which you'd expect to be a bargain, but we've decided you've been taking advantage of us for years so there is a 150% tariff we've placed on it resulting in a $1.87 price before other taxes.

This is the end of my joke, but I have to share this part. I went looking for a picture to include in this post and found one on NPRs website from 2012 when the Doritos Loco taco first came out (Wait Wait Don't Tell Me show). They were commenting on it and I'm laughing hard at some of these comments:

  • Eva: Everything about this is disgusting, and I love it.
  • Peter: I don't like it. I open my mouth and take a breath before biting it, and get a lungful of powder. It's part taco, part asthma inhaler.
  • Eva: Dorito's orange powder: The fat man's cocaine.
  • Peter: Next time somebody thinks they've hit bottom, they should ask themselves, "Sure, I've lost my job and my spouse, but am I eating a Dorito Supreme? No? Then party on."
  • Eva: Just like with regular Doritos, you can't eat just one. Which must be why I just absent-mindedly ate 23 tacos.
  • Mike: This is the perfect combination of two things that are terrible for you. As if ammonia and hydrochloric acid, mixed together, tasted like chocolate.
  • (Eva is offered another.) Eva: No thanks. I ate the first one, but now I feel really bad about it.
  • Mike: Exactly. I'm trying to find an analogy, for something you do, but don't enjoy. It's like shooting Lenny at the end of "Of Mice and Men."
  • Peter: Think of the tacos, Lenny! Think of the Tacos!
  • [The verdict: If you like Doritos, in all their orangey glory, you will like these, but just a little while later you will regret everything you've done to lead you to that moment.]

source

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn't work. Sorry.

Trump is team (diet) Coke, and Taco Bell is owned by Yum Brands, which is owned by Pepsi.

Now if it came with its "own" Diet Trump Cola, maybe. The cup could have a depiction of Don Taco thin/muscular, you know, how he sees himself in a mirror

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I knew about the Pepsi relationship, but the forced Diet Coke just adds to the absurdity and just had to be included in the joke.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

But a failed shitty product is right in line with Trump about as far back as it goes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Taco? On an article by Latin times? That's racist! Lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I didn't even notice that. Good catch. Don't worry about it, though. I took a photo op of me eating a taco salad (an originally Mexican and completely authentic dish) while saying, "I love Hispanics!" That means I can't possibly be bigoted against Latinos.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That situation sounds somewhat familiar. Almost like some high-profile figure has done it before...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

I was just joking around. I can't imagine that the public would tolerate, much less be fooled by, such transparent and sloppy manipulation. That would be like the US President selling crypto, or promoting a brand of cars, or selling access to himself. I just don't see that happening.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 weeks ago

We took our ball and left, everyone else just went to play a different game. Good thing Titler is the best recess schoolyard bully

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s like when the girl you asked for a date never texted you back.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago

Or like when the girl you "theatened" not to date unless she was willing to do certain things never texted you back.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

When an office with unhinged idiots sends you a message ... no matter how important it sounds

It's best not to respond

Their game is to play back and forth rage baiting that leads to nowhere and nothing ... so the only way to shut them down is to never speak to them or answer them or acknowledge them. The silence and non-response just kills them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

This is the way. Attention-seeking, authoritarian, narcissistic, maniacs can't stand firm non-participation.

"Lead, follow, or get out of the way."

"No. Fuck off Karen. I was here first."

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Rest of the world, in their best Joe Pesci voice: "you were serious about that?"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yet Vinny went to jail for contempt.

Trump is contemptible and it got him the White House.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How appropriate is it that this took place on taco Tuesday?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

New world trading amongst themselves, who dis?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Lol at conservative conspiracy theorists who were all worried about a New World Order... hadn't considered what happens when the New World Order comes and we weren't invited.

We'll look at the 2024-2025 economy the same way we look at 2007-2008 TV shows. Just a whole bunch of great stories getting thrown in the shitter.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

It’s about time for the weekly tariff threats, after all. Then they will be walked back next week.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds like Soft Taco is having a moment.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Translation: They thought everyone would be crawling over eachother to contact them first.


It has happened multiple times now in different situations, where they set demands and/or set up meetings. And then they don't send out or prepare paperwork. They just assume that the other party will be so eager to meet their demands, that everything will be done for them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Sing to the tune of Macho Man by the Village People

He's a TACO TACO man. That chicken shit mango is a TACO man!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Let's go Taco.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Go back to the chair in the corner, taco don

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

USG left on read