this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
1016 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

23844 readers
3029 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

javascript is to web developers what powerpoint is to sales people

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Imagine doing math with strings and then blaming the language not yourself

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The risk is when it happens unintentionally. The language is bad for hiding such errors by being overly 'helpful' in assuming intent.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sure, but at this point it's your own fault if you don't use Typescript to keep these issues from happening.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Use a different language" is a common defense of javascript, but kind of a weird one.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not really, considering Typescript only adds static types to JS. It's not a different language, it's an extension.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Since it needs to be compiled to JavaScript in order to be used, I kind of consider it a different language. Yes, it's a strict superset of JavaScript, but that makes it different.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So, just don’t use JavaScript?

[–] matlag 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's also my understanding: "Javascript is great because you can use other languages and then transpile them to JS."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

The problem is consistency.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Javascript is a dogshit language that everyone is stuck with. The best that we can hope for is the likes of typescript take the edge off of it. Even though it's like smearing marzipan over a turd. At least it's ok if you don't take a deep bite.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

JS should have never leaved the Browser side. Now you can use this thing for Backend and is just awful

[–] [email protected] 203 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (17 children)

This is too stupid so I had to check.

Fuck me.

[–] [email protected] 113 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Hm, playing devil's advocate, I think it is because the minus has not been defined as a string operation (e.g. it could pop the last char), so it defaults to the mathematical operation and converts both inputs into ints.

The first is assumed to be a concat because one of the parcels is a string...

It's just doing a lot of stuff for you that it shouldn't be in first place 🤭

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Yup. It's completely inconsistent in its interpretation of the + operator.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 days ago

From all the Javascript quiks this is the least stupid and the most obvious.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This here is my absolute favorits way to diss someone. Send the a wikipeda link and bam!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

It does to some degree.

  • "11" is string, 1 is an int, because strings can be added (+) convert int to string and combine: "11"+"1" = "111"
  • "11" is string, 1 is an int, because strings cant be subtracted (-) convert string to int and combine: 11-1 = 10

I'm not into JS so I don't know how it takes priority. ints can be added too, so I guess its basing it on the first variable which is compatible with the operator: in the first case string, in the second case int.

If this is how it works, it makes sense. But imo its a case of the designers being preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

.... It does?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

so plus coerces into string if not number, was that so hard?

[–] candyman337 8 points 2 days ago

Oh wow, that's upsetting

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To start off... Using arithmetic operators on strings in combination with integers is a pure skill issue. Let's disregard this.

If you were to use + where one part is a string, it's natural to assume a string appending is desired since + is commonly used as a function for this. On the other hand, - is never used for any string operation. Therefore, it's safe to assume that it relates to actual artihmetics and any strings should therefore be converted to numerical values.

This is an issue with untyped languages. If you don't like it, use typescript. End of story.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Instead of trying to make it work, javascript could just say "error." Being untyped doesn't mean you can't have error messages.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's because + is two different operators and overloads based on the type to the left, while - is only a numeric operator and coerces left and right operands to numeric. But frankly if you're still using + for math or string concatenation in 2025, you're doing it wrong.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I know nothing about javascript, what is wrong with using + for math? perhaps naively, I'd say it looks suited for the job

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The correct way to do it is to load a 500mb library that has an add function in it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

It's much better to make your own function that uses bitwise operations to do addition.

function add(a, b) {
    while (b !== 0) {
        // Calculate carry
        let carry = a & b;

        // Sum without carry
        a = a ^ b;

        // Shift carry to the left
        b = carry << 1;
    }
    return a;
}

(For certain definitions of better.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 64 points 2 days ago (1 children)

[object Object][object Object]

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

If you're consciously and intentionally using JavaScript like that, I don't want to be friends with you.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 days ago (8 children)

People that try to do mathematical operations with strings blaming the programming language that had a stated design goal to do its best and try to keep running scripts that make no sense because they realized it would be used by people that have no idea what they are doing. Clearly they were right.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 days ago (3 children)

the programming language that had a stated design goal to do its best and try to keep running scripts that make no sense...

...itself makes no sense. It is wrong and bad that Javascript was ever designed that way in the first place.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

What no type safety does to an MF...

load more comments
view more: next ›