this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
269 points (96.9% liked)

politics

18863 readers
3824 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

President Joe Biden called Monday for action to end the type of “hate-fueled violence” that authorities said motivated a white man to fatally shoot three Black people at a Florida store over the weekend. Biden said people must speak out about injustice.

“We can’t let hate prevail, and it’s on the rise. It’s not diminishing,” Biden said at the White House as he met with civil rights advocates and the children of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. on the 60th anniversary of the March on Washington.

“Silence, I believe, we’ve all said many times, silence is complicity,” Biden said. “We’re not going to remain silent and, so, we have to act against this hate-fueled violence.”

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

Black people getting killed for being black again. LGBTQ people being the fodder of legal bigotry again. Death traps for foreign people. They're just people, folks. Like you and me.

Sometimes I think we are only in a cruel regressive rough patch in our history and will realign. But, I wonder how long it will take.

Guess I'll watch Simone Biles defying physics again. Always makes me feel better.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Silence is not the only way to be complicit. Cheap talk without action will do the job.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that Biden can only do so much. We like to imagine that the President is the ultimate leader of the land, but he really isn't. If Congress refuses to act (or can't due to filibusters in the Senate and a Republican controlled House), then the President can only do so much.

It also doesn't help when one of the two major parties tossed their dogwhistles aside and whips out the bullhorns instead. It's wrong to imply that both sides are equally to blame when one side is actively encouraging the racists and the other side is trying but failing to stop them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Please point out where I suggested the blame was equal. I don’t want to eat a shot sandwich, but it’s self-evidently better than a shit-and-glass-shard sandwich. That’s how I see the Dems and GOP. Bothsidesism is for fools.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't see much action from a keyboard warrior like you.

[–] idkwhatimdoing 1 points 1 year ago

Tbf you don't know what they're doing in addition to this. I'd get this comment on facebook or somewhere that you know the poster, but for all we know, Izzent is actually out there marching and more.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

You don’t know me, what I do, or what I have done. And because I do know what I’ve done, I don’t have to justify myself to you. Just because you sit on your ass all day arguing on the internet doesn’t mean that’s what everyone’s doing. Any more projection, you could run a movie theater.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

I mean if hurricanes are an indication of anything it’s that God hates the racists and their wealthy donors that live in central florida.

Hopefully this current one will wash a lot of them away because if there’s a Nazi nest that needs a cleaning it’s definitely in that area.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

The action, which won't be taken, is sorely needed.

It will only get worse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Maybe start with the inciters of racism and violence, your colleagues across the aisle.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Remember when trump sent a bunch of military and goons into Portland Oregon over BLM protests that up to that point had merely resulted in a little bit of damaged property? Yeah, I don’t think I’d have much to complain about if Biden sent troops into a few conservative states to sort some hate-crime stuff out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately we need more militantly anti-white-supremacy institutions to make a dent in the problem, and what we get is an occasional report acknowledging the issue and candle vigils to 'raise awareness'.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden called Monday for action to end the type of “hate-fueled violence” that authorities said motivated a white man to fatally shoot three Black people at a Florida store over the weekend.

Biden also addressed a reception Monday evening to mark the 60th anniversary of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, a nonpartisan, nonprofit legal organization that was established at President John F. Kennedy’s request to help advocate for racial justice.

Biden told the civil rights lawyers in the crowd that the country still needed them “badly” and called them “critical partners” in his administration’s fight for equity.

In an opinion piece written for the Washington Post, Biden said the administration is working to advance King’s dream of a society in which people don’t judge others by their skin color.

Biden’s meeting with King’s family and his remarks at the reception will give the president, who is running for reelection, an opportunity to appeal to Black voters by talking about what he and the broader administration have done to help make their lives better.

He kept a promise to put a Black woman — the first to serve — on the Supreme Court, but has been unable to follow through on pledges to shore up voting rights or enact changes to policing to help stop violence against people of color by law enforcement.


The original article contains 948 words, the summary contains 230 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!