The photo for the article is hilarious. No opticals, just iron sights. I got the mental image of the dude trying to aim at a radio 500m away.
this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
130 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
2662 readers
330 users here now
Which posts fit here?
Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
Post guidelines
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
[email protected]
[email protected]
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Just saying, you can absolutely hit something 500+ meters away with iron sights. Heck, I've personally done so at 900 meters. I'll grant that I was prone, however.
I mean, not having any bullet drop must be pretty nifty but unless it can auto target to a certain degree, you're gonna be better off trying to shoot it with a rifle or shotgun. I really doubt this thing can sustain fire.
No optics. /s
.
It's pretty common to avoid using products from other companies in PR photos and during promotional events/announcements(if there's no deal). And the prominant picatinny rail is enough to tell any potential buyers that they can attach almost anything they want.
It occurs to me that whenever cool new weapons get used for the first time, it is still a sad day.
Its funny because humans see themselves as very smart, but they built a society where everyone has to work all day to pay their bills, because fantasy "money" is seen as a real, almost physical limitation like air and water, and decider of life or death despite just existing inside computer programs.
And humans still fight eachother, kill eachother, have wars on a global scale, because all big country leaders are narcissist psychopats.
Actually when taking a step back from all this, its very sad to be part of this species. What are we supposed to be proud of when we leave this planet? I guess at least we can try to not do harm on a personal level and try to bring up children who can think for themselves and are kind to others.
We could use a mulligan on the last 12 eons, give or take.
Unless aliens attack! No, wait... Ok yeah.
They have better lasers than France, IIRC.
I feel like this article is maybe half human-written at most. The bullet-pointed section in the second half is giving AI slop vibes
I think its the new normal and its quite annoying. Luckily i dont read most major sites... If I want to find out something, I can just ask chat gpt directly and get a list of pros and cons.
Obviously being aware that its scewed into supporting whatever the official "message" is.
Hold on - do you seriously use ChatGPT as a news source?
For historic events yeah, its great.