Definitionally in IEEE floating point, NaN is not equal to anything, including itself. The only real abomination here is B:
> Math.min()
Infinity
> Math.max()
-Infinity
>
this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
63 points (93.2% liked)
Programmer Humor
36296 readers
575 users here now
Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)
Rules:
- Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
- No NSFW content.
- Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I mean, B does make some amount of sense, if you realize that it's supposed to give you the maximum among the parameters (so you'd normally call it as Math.max(5, 3) === 5).
Well, and you can call that with zero parameters, because you can spread an array into it, which might have zero length. And then given these conditions, and if you don't want to throw an error, then -Infinity is kind of the least bad remaining option, as it's likely to generally work with the rest of your logic.
I'm guessing C
yup
Moot! Those ALL fail code review!
A && B && C && D
It can't be anything other than B, right?
it's not B