this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
142 points (96.1% liked)

politics

23948 readers
4324 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 72 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Every article starts with the Trump administration framing, and only afterward tells you WTF actually happened. I'm so tired of it.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 weeks ago

Click bait rage inducing bullshit sells, and it's how Trump became a thing.

Him and headline news are perfect for each other

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's straight weaponization of the Justice department.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The term “eighty-six” is a verb, which the Merriam-Webster online dictionary defines as informally meaning “to refuse to serve” or “to eject or ban” a customer, and “to reject, discontinue, or get rid of” something.

Trump: "He called to have me killed!"

Calm down, snowflake in chief, he said you deserve to be let go. An opinion most of your country agrees with.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Too bad they didn't share that opinion on 11/5/24.

[–] rc__buggy 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You really think James Comey voted Trump last November?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

No..?

he said you deserve to be let go. An opinion most of your country agrees with.

Too bad they didn’t share that opinion on 11/5/24.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It took me too long to get it.

86, as used by restaurant staff to mean "get rid of" something.

47 because he's the 47th President.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

i'm making it my own personal holiday when that bloated sack of shit con man finally croaks, whatever the cause

[–] ThePantser 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Won't need to be a personal one, there is enough of us that we can make it an official one. Like 420, we shall celebrate his death with fireworks and drugs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Flags at full mast that day

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

Huh, here I thought it was the combination to his luggage.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd hate to say that Comey ever had a good idea, so I won't. Whoever gave him the idea for this is a genius. They like their 1488. But they'll melt down over this. I'm definitely on board with 8647. Buy whatever means necessary, impeachment etc.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

How many $86.47 deals are we gonna start seeing now?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

I'll say this. Anyone that offers a good value for it will likely have my money. And plenty of impulse buyers as well.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

i would take out a loan if that's all it would take....

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh of course it is. It's only ok if they do it

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Of course it is, Bezos is selling 8647 merch right now and there's not a peep about it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This 8647 alternator may be taking it a bit far though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Holy crap, is that a tariff price or are they WAY too proud?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

That is Ford motorcraft... It should be manufactured in America, right...?

... Right..?

Then again I ordered a DENSO (Japanese corporation and main supplier for OEM Toyota parts on their vehicles) part and it was made in China, so...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Ford? Mexico.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago

Only a fucking idiot would think 86 calls for killing. That would be 187

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago

It's 8647, snowflake. Not 18747.

[–] rc__buggy 11 points 3 weeks ago

These fucking assholes. I've been 86'd and the bartenders never tried to kill me.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No Donald, it was a joke, you just don't get it. But even even if it wasn't a joke, he didn't mean it. But even if he did mean it, it won't really happen.

He's never even heard of 86 and has nothing to do with it

[–] rc__buggy 1 points 3 weeks ago

Never even been in an actual "bar", never been in a kitchen he wasn't passing through.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Before we argue over what eighty six means, let's remember that It's perfectly legal to call for the assassination of a President.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

It's not, though. That's speech intended to incite lawless action, which is one of the few times free speech can be constitutionally restricted.

But yeah, 86 in this instance probably means impeachment.

[–] Typotyper 17 points 3 weeks ago

It’s only restricted for the democrats. The other guys post your address and nothing is said

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How do you explain the continued freedom of Kathy Griffith?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

She claims to be a comedian.

[–] rc__buggy 1 points 3 weeks ago

I'm of the opinion we should 86 him from the country. I would refuse service and remove him from the premises. Let him go to UAE and stay the rest of his days.

Banishment

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

Streisand Effect lol.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

I fucking wish

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

comey, the reason why you are president the 2nd time via the first term, and you throw your Fan under the bus.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Every bodies talking about 86 46, but what about 64 46? that's my number.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Glad to see I’m not the only one who made a song joke here

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

7-5309 is much more worried now

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Clearly he needs killing what's the issue you have freedom of speech the day he's killed the world will be a little better but his mates will use it as a excuse to take what's left of your rights you need to kill all of them