this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
1238 points (99.2% liked)

Microblog Memes

7583 readers
3921 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I don't want to be rich, I want to have enough money to have the following:

  • Hobbies
  • A garden (even if it's a shared garden)
  • Food on my table
  • A home
  • Maybe a vacation every couple of years

I currently have enough money for all of those except the garden because I can only afford a flat and my freeholders don't allow you to do any gardening.

The rest of my money can go to things I also want but not directly, like:

  • A well educated population
  • No homeless people
  • No crime
  • Healthcare for all
  • Good parks and public services

I don't need any more money than what will get me that! I'll even take out the garden if I means I only have to work four days a week. If I had a billion dollars, what would I even do with it? That's far too much money!

[–] [email protected] 40 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago

That's the revolution I will get behind

[–] [email protected] 23 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

I'm utterly convinced that whatever is going on mentally with people who have a hoarding problem is the same thing billionaires have as well except with money. It's literally a mental illness.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

If I had a billion dollars I wouldn't work another fucking day in my life.

Billionaires have more money than they could ever spend, and spend so much time and effort trying to increase the size of the hoard and make sure they don't have to pay an extra fraction of it in taxes. It's a sickness.

You don't become a billionaire without being mentally ill, and for some reason we think the mentally ill are the most fit to run corporations.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Hell, you can give away 990 million of it, buy a house, put what's left in a high yield savings account, and live comfortably on the interest alone for the rest of your life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

And that is why there is no such thing as an ethical billionaire.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 20 hours ago

Once you have more than say 500million dollars, your bank account becomes purely a highscore entry

[–] [email protected] 8 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

They are, because corporations are about taking as much profits away from others as possible and getting them for yourself. Its nothing nice about it. But it gives jobs.

This entire society is built on just taking resources, taking land, taking power from someone else, so you can benefit and not the others.

If there would be cooperation instead, humans could make a dream world here. But they cant. Its just in their fucking heads that they need to take more from others instead of sharing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 21 hours ago

“They’re rabid humans. Rabid with greed. They should be put down like the rabid dogs they are”

  • Bill Burr
[–] [email protected] 158 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I want Fuck You Money not Fuck Everyone Money

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

I want enough money to go on a trip and visit a friend without having to scrimp and save to do it, not enough money to buy an airline and demand people pay me $40 if they want to sit with their spouse

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

I want this on a bumper sticker.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 21 hours ago

There is a reason you never hear of normal working people coming into a lot of money and turning it into billions. It takes some serious mental illness that usually is hereditary to have the drive to exploit soo many people for so long. Billionaires are special alright. But they are the kind of special the world could do without.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

I want enough money to afford a small apartment, food, utilities, and healthcare.

(Yes I know im asking for a lot under this capitalist tyranny)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I would like the luxury of choice of food, I know it's a lot.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Even better, the luxury of food without microplastics

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

I mean I'll take a lil microplastic if it comes in a kebab

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 100 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I think this stems from a misunderstanding of how much money a billion dollars is

[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 day ago

As the current popular phrase goes, the difference between a million and a billion is about a billion.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

https://eattherichtextformat.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/

This can be helpful if you're dealing with ignorance rather than malice

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

That site is such an eye opener. I still haven't managed to get to the end every time I visit the site

Such incomprehensible wealth

And for what? To fuck everyone

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Yeah "rich" starts at way less than a billion dollars. Someone with a paltry 10 million in the bank is already absolutely loaded, and has won the game.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Most of us would be more than happy with 100k in the bank, honestly, as long as our society is stable and structured to care for “nonproductives”. Nobody really needs a lot, we just need long-term stability.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

really you don't need money at all, what you need is a society around you that produces things and gives you company.
100k isn't going to help me much if a blight wipes out all the tomatoes in europe, unless i want to fly to another continent just to eat some tomatoes for a while

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 21 hours ago

I have financial security, I want everyone to have that.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I have had this conversation with my semi wealthy friends ... one friend in particular who probably has million or two in wealth. Not super wealthy but wealthy enough.

I've debated with him that there should be a wealth cap in society to not allow any one person to have such obscene amounts of wealth and that society should impose a wealth cap. He argued that this is a terrible idea because it would remove the incentive for everyone to want to achieve higher amounts of wealth ... it would demotivate people from wanting to achieve business and development. But he justified it by saying that he didn't like the idea and that it wasn't just about the money, it was the idea.

I'm beginning to think that many or most people are just preprogrammed to believe or want to believe in Gods and God Kings. That many or most people believe in the idea that there should be haves and have nots and that there is no solution that they could imagine to solve that situation.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago

This narrative keeps being peddled by capitalists, but it is false.

Humans are often intrinsically motivated. People dont get more money by working at a soup kitchen. They dont get financial rewards for looking after their grandchildren....

Capitalists need to instill this idea that everything needs to be motivated by money and every interaction between humans needs to be commodified. Otherwise the greedy hoarders would be exposed as such at the system would collapse as people help each other just because it is the right thing to do.

Networks of mutual aid and care are politically dangerous To capitalism as it means resilient people who value life over money. These need to be crushed for capitalism to prevail.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

Well I'll one-up the one who tweeted this.

I want everyone to have something that's higher than what a living wage would be. I want strong worker's unions that people are added to by default when they join the workforce of a business. I want the profit that a business makes to be divided equally among all the workers....with owner-operated businesses being the exception to that rule, but only if the operating owner only owns the one business they're operating

I want the necessity of charity to be a thing of the past, I want every american citizen to be able to own a house with a yard in a town that's designed well and I want policiticans to be afraid of pissing off their constituents. I want communities to be tight-knit and friendly with each other.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I have been considering at what point is accumulation immortal.

Clearly, location matters. I think certainly by $100 million, one is immoral ($4 million to safety spend each year.) Perhaps $10 million is immoral. I am fairly certain $5 million ($200K to spend in a year) is okay. I am confident that $1 million is fine ($40K per year.)

Thoughs?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

My idea is to implement a wealth tax rate of 3% on everything above an exempt amount of $10 million, that is to be paid annually.

This way, there is no hard limit. You can have more money without going to jail, but you have to help the community.


The rule would work something like this:

  1. the rule applies to all citizens of the United States
  2. calculate the total wealth of the person:
    • items such as money on bank accounts, shares in companies, real estate, and other valuables are estimated and added
    • debts and other negative value can be deducted
  3. if the amount is less than $10 million, no taxes are paid
  4. otherwise, subtract $10 million from the total net worth, then multiply by 0.03, that is the value that you have to pay

this procedure is to be repeated annually

to prevent people from giving up their US citizenship and taking on the citizenship of some other country, which may not have a wealth tax, there needs to be a way to make sure the US citizenship remains attractive to people. for example, if you do not have US citizenship, you're not allowed to possess more than $10 million in total wealth inside the US, i.e. in real estate, company shares and bank accounts.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago

That's called a wealth tax and it exists in (for example) the Netherlands. All assets except your house over 57k€ are taxed every year.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

My idea is to implement a wealth tax rate of 3% on everything above an exempt amount of $10 million, that is to be paid annually.

Not enough. Their fortunes need to actually shrink when above a certain amount. 7%+ is where we need to be to even counter their annual growth.

Accumulating that much wealth isn't just bad because it's unfair, it's bad because it gives them so much influence in politics, economy and society which damages Democracy and markets.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

I want $50,000,000 so I can park it in the bank and live off 2-3% interest for the rest of my life. Anything else I'll just donate or whatever while I volunteer or work a low paying job that's fun and rewarding.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

2-3 Million € would be enough to comfortably live off and be at or close to 0 when I kick the bucket. If I somehow won that much, I'd not work a day in my life ever again.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

£600,000 would be enough for me to quit work. Buy a house and then do odd jobs to supplement money for the remainder of my life.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I think you might be underestimating the ongoing costs of owning a house as many people do. Or we have a different understanding of odd jobs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I can buy a house near me for £100,000. That means I have £500,000 left to earn interest on steadily.

Without taking in pay rises I will be working for the next 25 years and won’t earn too much more than £500,000 anyway. I am lucky in that my job is very chill and my salary is for 33 hours a week and we get 4 weeks holiday at the moment. Will rise to 5 weeks.

I class odd jobs as maybe a Saturday job or several days a week. I am also good at just learning how to do things myself. Need to do some joinery great I’ve got all the time in the world.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I can buy a house near me for £100,000.

For that I couldn't even buy a piece of empty land for a house to stand on.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

UK still has some cheaper areas. I know a guy that bought one near Burnley for £60k. Like the whole estate went to shit and so many got sold for this price. They needed a lot of work and the dude I know is a builder so he spent two years working and now it’s livable. Sadly he did it to rent out, but I would live in a shit whole. If I own it.

The town I live now is pretty rough, although we live in the nicer area but I’ve grown up working class and people ain’t that bad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

That's another thing: You can certainly buy older, cheaper objects if you're competent in doing a lot of things yourself. But with rising energy prices, the necessary transition in e.g. heating technology and so on, I wouldn't be able to do all the work that would be required to get an old house up to a somewhat modern standard where I won't be actively harming climate and paying out of my nose for gas (or even worse, oil) to stay warm in winter.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’ve calculated that I could retire right now on $3 million USD, and be able to maintain my current salary, with cost of living increases each year until I die.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Glad you have a target.

One tweek you may consider. As you won't be saving for retirement in retirement, focusing on matching current spending not salary may produce a more enjoyable number. Otherwise a salary raise will push back the retirement date.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

I just want enough to be able to ensure I have a home, food, and healthcare. I’m basically hoarding money for an old age without socialism

load more comments
view more: next ›