this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
22 points (89.3% liked)

Cybersecurity

7157 readers
90 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Community Rules

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Notable mention to [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

[This is an op-ed by Tin Pak, visiting academic at the National Defense University and a researcher at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research in Taiwan, and Chen Yu-cheng, an associate professor at the National Defense University.

The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics.

An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency. HEMP weapons fit both criteria. In nanoseconds, a single HEMP detonation at an altitude between 20km and 50km can disable electronic infrastructure across large swathes of Taiwan. There would be little warning, as the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) fields DF-17 hypersonic missiles, capable of delivering a HEMP warhead above Taiwan in a matter of minutes.

HEMPs strike at the foundation of modern society, its electronic systems. Every critical infrastructure uses electronics, from telecommunications, hospitals, energy production and distribution facilities, and even water purification systems.

...

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Genius. Let's use a weapon that specifically destroys the one thing that makes Taiwan truly valuable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

At this point, I'd believe them to be desperate enough to take over to distract from economic troubles back home that they'd willingly shoot themselves in the foot by using this on Taiwan and anyone else they percieve as a threat.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Some China watchers might shrug off the HEMP threat as highly unlikely, pointing to China’s nuclear no-first-use policy. However, China does not view HEMPs as a nuclear weapon, despite its use of a nuclear warhead.

It probably matters more whether Taiwan’s allies, the US in particular, would consider a HEMP to be a nuclear attack.

[–] bathing_in_bismuth 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How would an HEMP warhead differ from an convential nuclear warhead detonated in the atmosphere?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

It's been a while since I read about it, but I imagine it's specifically tuned to produce EM frequencies which electronics are most sensitive to.

VS producing biologically-sensitive frequencies and pressure waves.