this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
96 points (81.2% liked)

Ask Lemmy

31432 readers
1535 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Asking this as a Qatari with a polygamous father. My father’s second wife is Swedish and I know it was a tough pill to swallow for her family and friends back home.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Because the concept of "Marriage" was created to cement political, fiducial, and martial alliances between families of Aristos. Multiple entities complicates those agreements.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

For some reason, monogamy was the default in Europe, and that default goes back thousands of years. There were times when men could have second or more partners, but they were never on the same level as wife and any children born from these unions weren't entitled to inherit anything from the father. It is just a cultural signifier that goes back before Christianity; Romans were monogamous.

To add to this, Western peoples have slowly redefined marriage over the past century to go from a man and his wife to the union of two people. This has given women more power in marriage while also allowing for same gender marriages, since gender is no longer a defining characteristic of marriage in a Western society. I would see same gender marriages being harder in a polygamous society as gender is hard coded into the rules.

As for the Western aversion to polygamy, you've seen a lot of people here describe polygamy as "less civilized". That belief has been around for centuries, so it isn't tied to marriage equality For instance, the statehood of Utah was delayed until the Mormon church gave up polygamy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I think polyamory happens a lot more than we realize. My old roommate had two committed partners for years, one of whom was married to someone else. Everyone knew about each other.

I knew a thruple who were unofficially married and lived together.

They have groups on social media for discussion and support, where I learned anything more than a thruple is "Polycule."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

The frowning upon is religion based values. On the other hand multipe wives and no other husbands allowed is also religion based.
Next question would be why is same sex marriage frowned upon?

There is a reason why ancient societies were matriarchy based. It was always easy to tell who the mother was. And because of that the wealth was tied to the mother's bloodline instead of the father's.
If you want a real - future proof inheritance system: leave everything to the mother than as she dies the children get everything.

One on one pairing is more fair with big numbers. You no longer have to take your brother's widow as a wife, you do not need to marry to make sure you have one extra goat to milk ar having a maid and incubator for the next generation.
Humans generally speaking do not need to make more than 2 kids. Your bloodline won't die out because of modern medicine. Nobody's bloodline worth anything anyway. Your genes are not that superior.

So there is no logical reason to support a one sided marriage system.
Now open polyamory where everyone is on board, equal, open about it and can leave any time - go ahead that totally green light from me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because religion. Christianity stipulated monogamous marriage and while most of the West now finds it stupid to let religion dictate how we live our lives it's still the norm.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

This is entirely incorrect

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

OP your nativity is something to be cherished. I hope you never lose your innocence.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Where's the 'baby Jesus' in this post?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As said, most probably Christian heritage. Even in secular countries like France it is forbidden.

To be precise about France, only polygamous weddings are forbidden but being polygamous without being wedded is not illegal. I think it has historically something to do with central Africa immigration from the former colonies.

You could migrate to France and ask for family reunion to have your wife and kids legally come, but I guess they wanted to put some limits so it was decided that wedding means one partner only. Those laws were made by old right wing parties so it is kind of logical that they wanted to limit African immigration to 2 adults + kids instead of 4 adults + kids.

Would it be frowned upon? Maybe, mostly by older folks and more traditional peoples but the larger part of the population would just not care. The problem is with legal status, without a wedding you can have child care and heritage problems in case of death.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To be precise about France, only polygamous weddings are forbidden but being polygamous without being wedded is not illegal.

True that, but those persons still lack any legal status, unlike married or 'pacs'ed couples. I mean legally, in such a, err, cluster of person would be considered the head of the family and no one would be able to take medical decision for the others if they needed (they aren't considered 'family') and no could inherit from the other(s) I mean not tax-free like in a standard couple. And the moment they've kids... Things can become real hairy. Edit: well, exactly like you mentioned already (I should have read the entire comment :p) but the point is that they would lack any legal status (like up until recently homosexual couples up until recently would have lacked one as they could not get married or pacsed).

Would it be frowned upon?

At the very least, feminists (young as well as old ones) would frown upon that. And I think most people would look down on it, even if they may not be openly hostile.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because Christianity. That’s really it

Except for some extreme forms of Mormonism of course

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Historically, most forms of polygamy are very misogynistic. It's not just because of Christianity, it's more due to how it was implemented.

It is absolutely possible to have a great polygamous relationship, but especially recent history has been filled with examples of it being used as a way to subjugate, not free people.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›