I think LW agreed to remove their listing because they are already very big.
this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
11 points (100.0% liked)
Lemmy.world Support
3374 readers
9 users here now
Lemmy.world Support
Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.
This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.
This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.
To open a support ticket
You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email [email protected] (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.
Follow us for server news ๐
Outages ๐ฅ
https://status.lemmy.world/
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
afaik this is not something that we were involved in, but the lemmy devs implemented a threshold to exclude instances with 30% or more monthly active user share.
i don't mind it, better distribution of users across instances is good.
I stand corrected.
It's a mistake, imo. Any server that's managed by a team (org) instead of one person and is hosted in a datacenter and with a reasonable number of users should have priority on that list.
It's great that you can host Lemmy from your basement. But that experience should be left for advanced users who understand federation, and won't have an issue migrating when feddit.de goes down.
- lemmy.ca is managed by https://fedecan.ca/en/
- you mentioned feddit.de, but feddit.org learned from the past and is now managed by https://fediverse.foundation/
๐