this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
571 points (98.8% liked)

World News

45492 readers
5654 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Russia was excluded from Trump’s sweeping tariff list due to existing U.S. sanctions that limit trade, White House officials claimed.

Despite lower trade volumes, countries like Syria were still included, prompting skepticism.

Trump has prioritized ending the war in Ukraine and threatened 50% tariffs on nations buying Russian oil. Russian state media framed the omission as sanctions-based, not favoritism, with some mocking Trump’s harsher stance on allies.

Ukraine, meanwhile, faces a 10% tariff despite the country’s strategic partnership with the U.S.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tempus_Fugit@midwest.social 130 points 3 days ago (2 children)

He certainly isn't trying to beat those "Russian asset" allegations is he?

[–] elvith@feddit.org 27 points 3 days ago

What? Comrade Krasnov? A Russian asset? Never!

[–] Flemmy@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago

And a whole nation's gotta take it in the behind for this. Classic king of the hill stuff.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 43 points 3 days ago

Uninhabited islands: tariffs

Allies: tariffs

Israel: believe it or not, tariffs

Russia: crickets

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 70 points 3 days ago

But uninhabited islands are

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Strange, what reason did the USA give for economically attacking all of their trading partners except Russia and Russia's close allies?

[–] Washedupcynic@lemm.ee 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
[–] Wiz@midwest.social 5 points 3 days ago

Our trade with the penguins were also zero. We terriffed the penguins anyway!

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 8 points 3 days ago

Who cares, its just lies anyway.

[–] gargolito@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago

The island populated by penguins has to pay tariffs but not Russia. Ok

[–] ploot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

All that time and money invested in agent Krasnov is really paying off.

[–] pelespirit 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It wasn't because of sanctions or not doing any trade with Russia, this bears repeating from the article:

However, nations with even less trade with the US - such as Syria, which exported $11m of products last year according to UN data quoted by Trading Economics - were on the list.

According to the Office of the US Trade Representative, the US imported goods from Russia worth $3.5bn (£2.7bn) in 2024. It mainly consisted of fertilisers, nuclear fuel and some metals, according to Trading Economics and Russian media.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

If I'm a politician and I'm putting tariffs in place, the one place getting annihilated by a 1,000% tariff is the place I've already sanctioned into the ground. Is that performative? Maybe. Would it prevent headlines like this? Yep.

Makes you wonder what's going on in the swamp.

[–] Nusm@yall.theatl.social 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Read all about it in this month’s riveting issue of Duh.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

sanctions limits trade? but countries with hardly any trade with US are getting tariffs.

[–] filister@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lesotho - 50%, Saint Pierre & Miquelon - 50%.

But seriously, American consumers should say bye bye to cheap clothes, etc. as everything there is about to get a lot more expensive. The reality is that America was prospering in parts to all those third world countries. And it is kind of stupid to think that you can replace their products with local manufacturing as you lack both the skill set on the local work force nor the salary levels.

They also kicked all their immigrants who were working those shitty low paid jobs and I am sure as hell those employers are now struggling big time to find other people willing to do the same for the same pay.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Interesting to see what would happen. Prices of goods in US will go up due to tariffs, similar locally made good will be expensive too due to local cost of manufacturing, labor.

Meanwhile consumer in the rest of the world are enjoying life buying cheap clothes and electronics made in SEA, China, s.america and etc.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago

Trump is a Russian loving traitor.

[–] ArbitraryValue 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

Cuba, Belarus and North Korea were also not included

At least they're being consistent. If Biden had excluded Russia along with those countries from some global economic policy, I wouldn't be suspicious.

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It's probably dumber than you think why they weren't on there. The formula they used to come up with the countries tarrifs rate is based simply on trade deficit calculations. So if you aren't exporting/importing from those countries they wouldn't be included. It doesn't even matter if there was a trade surplus.

For example, take the figures for China:

  • Goods trade deficit: $291.9bn
  • Total goods imports: $438.9bn
  • 291.9/438.9 = 0.67, or 67%
  • And halved = 34%

Sources:

https://www.ft.com/content/e025d7e6-512d-4e82-9c25-7900b94ac153

https://news.sky.com/story/do-trumps-tariff-numbers-add-up-after-liberation-day-announcement-13340903

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/03/trumps-idiotic-and-flawed-tariff-calculations-stun-economists

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This can't explain the exclusion of Russia, since the entirely uninhabited Heard and McDonald Islands got their own entry on the list. There cannot be a trade balance with a place where nobody lives. The islands got the "base rate" of 10%, so for Russia to have been excluded there has to have been another reason

[–] joekar1990@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Honestly they probably plugged it into Grok and asked it to spit out the list of countries to tariff.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Shocked I say. Shocked that Putin's puppet is not putting Tariffs on someone that is trying to take over another country.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago

You know what other place has limited trace but still got hit with tariffs? Heard Island and Mcdonald Island since they are uninhabited.

[–] Geetnerd@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

"What? That can't be so..."

load more comments