this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
918 points (95.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

7234 readers
3171 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 146 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair "centrist" in the USA is "extremely rightwing" everywhere else, the USA is super consumed by rightwing retoric

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Thanks McCarthy and the red scare! You did a real long-lasting number on rhetoric here in the states.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

I wonder how he/they would feel if they could see the right NOW...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

I think you mean McCarthy's assistant, Roy Cohn.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 99 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When genocide and no genocide are both too extreme, maybe a little genocide? Or a genocide far away? Or maybe killing a group that doesn't qualify the definition of genocide?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago (15 children)

Or maybe killing a group that doesn't qualify the definition of genocide?

yeah let's kill a group of people that is not a group of people

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Killing the rich wouldn't be genocide.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

But it would be pretty based.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Just kill 50% at random. Perfectly balanced

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I understood that reference.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which niche, obscure, underappreciated work of art is that comment referring to?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Well you see that's why the case must be made they are slightly less human.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 week ago (6 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago

It's important to consider all points. It's also important to analyze them and throw out the ones that are wrong, whether they're incorrect or inhumane. Blindly accepting all opinions as equally valid is stupid.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

Bullshit

I'm a centrist

The Israeli government and Hamas leadership should both be put in front of a wall and shot

Trump is a lying narcissistic sack of shit, just like Elmo Musk

None of that should be on any political side, those are obviously human choices

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They forget that centrists don't mean being in the middle of each extreme. If one side is calling for genocide and the other is calling for the prosecution of those advocating for genocide, a centrist perspective isn't about endorsing a little bit of genocide or putting a few people in prison.

Instead, it involves investigating how we reached a situation where people are calling for genocide, apprehending the group that could actually commit genocide, and dismantling the institutions that made it possible for people to join that group. This process is resource-intensive and often anticlimactic.

You don't win by persecuting people, you win by making it difficult to commit crimes. It is a slow process that requires swift action.

The left's search for idealism is what doomed them in the 2024 election.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You don't win by persecuting people, you win by making it difficult to commit crimes.

Well provided you accept that you need to prosecute the people who've already committed crimes. You can't just go ooh well it's society's fault so let them be

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Of course you have to prosecute criminals, what is an alternative for that?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Making them president, apparently

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

If one side is calling for genocide and the other is calling for the prosecution of those advocating for genocide, a centrist perspective isn't about endorsing a little bit of genocide or putting a few people in prison.

This is not the situation. Both the fascist Republican and the Democratic Party, that's supposed to be the opposition to Fascism, unconditionally supported arming a state that has not only been committing genocide for over 15 months, but has committed ethnic cleansing, apartheid, and settler colonialism for over 76 years.

Instead, it involves investigating how we reached a situation where people are calling for genocide, apprehending the group that could actually commit genocide, and dismantling the institutions that made it possible for people to join that group. This process is resource-intensive and often anticlimactic.

This is an incredibly far left position to the Democratic Party, which denounced the ICC arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant and the ICJ case against Israel. Nor is it anticlimactic when we know genocide is already underway because of how incredibly well documented it has been.

The left's search for idealism is what doomed them in the 2024 election.

Do you mean the Democratic Party here? Because what doomed them is ignoring the demands of their constituents. "The Left" in the US is entirely grassroots and had no effect on the policies of the Democratic Party during the election.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Driving 3 million people into a concentration camp and restricting food, water, and medicine is with the intention to ethnically cleanse them is bad, but have you considered that using violence to escape that concentration camp is also bad?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
Turning and turning in the widening gyre   
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere   
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst   
Are full of passionate intensity.

- W.B. Yeats, The Second Coming (1919)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

This is just more jibledek bunk. Typical jibblist prattling on about their things and giving not a single consideration to the obivous pliquist arguments against. And all this even after the main hedging of Two Whistlers!

Ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

yeah this really is what centrism looks like. although I gotta say, a lot of people are so reactive towards this line of thinking that they identify anyone questioning their beliefs as "centrists". no, not wanting russia to control the world does not make me a centrist. just like criticizing the democrats does not make me a centrist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Centrists are just lazy at this point. They’re basically “I thing treating people bad is bad, but I don’t want rules and taxes either, so I’ll settle for treating people-not-me badly if I don’t have more rules and taxes.”

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Reddit be like

load more comments
view more: next ›