this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
41 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

31778 readers
896 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In Bookwyrm there are way too many duplicate authors and books, and a way to merge them is unclear.

Open Library seems to offer a more unified and consistent database.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 25 minutes ago

Any other sources of audiobooks besides my local public library and librivox?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I think they have different use cases. OL may have a more consistent library, but Bookwyrm has the (social) features im looking for in a book app.

Personally I add books to OL and then import to BW.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 minutes ago

Oh wow, I never thought to do it that way, but it makes so much sense! Thanks for the tip

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 hours ago

Open Library is the main data source for Bookwyrm for book data. Bookwyrm is an application in the Fediverse that can be used to find and write reviews of books. I wouldn't see that as a contradiction.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Considering who is behind it, I just use Open Library. In particular because like you say, their actual data is much more useful.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Who is behind bookwyrm and why is that a reason to not use it?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Other way around. Open Library is part of the internet archive. Given it's also vastly superior in quality and has tools to maintain and administrate the data, I very much prefer it over alternative offerings. If Bookwyrm at least had a curation/maintainence team or support group or something, and not everyone could just nilly-willy add duplicates of existing entries, then I could see more use for it.

But like others have said, it's also a bit of a different use case. If you want to pull data, definitely do it from OL. They're the same source Bookwyrm uses for its main data import, after all.