this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
352 points (97.3% liked)

politics

21970 readers
4019 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Jon Stewart slammed Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer for supporting a GOP funding bill after initially opposing it.

On The Daily Show, Stewart mocked Schumer for surrendering leverage without gaining anything in return, joking that he “got some cheese.”

He criticized Schumer’s strategy of waiting for Trump’s popularity to drop, calling it delusional.

Stewart argued Democrats avoid proposing real alternatives by pretending Republicans will compromise. He warned their approval rating is dangerously low, making their approach politically ineffective and out of touch.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

Can we start using "Vichy" to describe any Democrats who collaborate with the fascists?

Jon Stewart slammed Vichy Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer...

Stewart argued Vichy Democrats avoid proposing real alternatives by pretending Republicans will compromise.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 39 minutes ago

I second this.

[–] Bakkoda 20 points 2 hours ago

The real takeaway is that the country is burning and our politicians are yucking it up together in a gym. We're 100% in the ivory tower phase. They are removed from it therefore they don't care enough to do anything but the same old same old.

We need to bring the issues to them in creative ways so that they feel the "impact" of our anger.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It's a uniparty and it's not there to help you, prole.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 42 minutes ago

I think there are actual elected Democrats who want to oppose the fascists. Look at Bernie, AOC, Crockett, even Pritzker and Walz. Hell, even Seth fucking Moulton and Nancy fucking Pelosi criticized Vichy Schumer over his collaboration and capitulation.

The problem is the Democrats, at the national level, are all led by the Vichy caucus of the party. Schumer, Jeffries, Newsom, etc who actually agree with the fascists on a number of issues.

We can't write off everyone elected with a (D) next to their name. History has shown us time and time again that the only thing that has ever defeated a powerful fascists movement is a popular front of leftists and liberals working together. We need to eliminate the Vichy wing of the Democratic Party. I'm not going to pretend like I know how to do that, but we're never going to defeat the fascists if we keep lumping everyone in with the collaborationists. That just fractures our side and strengthens theirs.

And electoral politics can't be the only thing we do. It's one tactic, but it's not the only or even most important one. Most importantly, we need to build connections and networks within our communities so that we can support each other against the fascists. We need to establish the relationships now so that when the fascists come for the marginalized in our community people (especially those less engaged with politics) are more willing to side with the victims of the fascists who they've come to know against the power structures.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 hour ago

I am tired of this doofus

[–] [email protected] 73 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

Highly paid, neo-liberal consultants that lost them multiple elections told Democratic leadership to become more Republican and that's just what the Democratic leadership did by voting with Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 40 minutes ago

told Vichy Democrats~~ic leadership~~ to become more Republican

FTFY!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 5 minutes ago)

It's almost like they'd rather continue to talk to consultants than their own constituents post-Hilary and when your ideas are only to position yourself against the other guy, well you don't have very many ideas at all. At least you still get to feel morally superior and continue building your own careerist resume. Democratic leadership don't care about anyone but themselves and it shows. These people don't work for you.

https://youtu.be/5Gq16RO2XB0

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 hours ago

Politicians kept those fucks on

[–] [email protected] 103 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Jon Stewart slammed

I mean, this was actually on-point. it was pretty vicious, and deservedly so.

Jon Stewart Knocks Dems' Lack of Vision In Countering The Trump Agenda | The Daily Show

sorry for the YouTube link, could not find it elsewhere.

edit: CW - animated intense mortal kombat violence at the very, very end of the video. the daily show was not playing around on this one.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 hours ago

Thanks for the link. Well worth the watch.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

so when do we start calling them "schumer" cocktails?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 hours ago

Cucktails oooh ooooh!