this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2025
194 points (99.5% liked)

politics

22045 readers
3729 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Musk has witnessed a mass sell-off of Teslas in recent weeks, in protest against his unprecedented intrusion into the US government through the so-called “department of government efficiency”. Sales of new vehicles have declined around the world, with February sales in Australia down about 72% compared with the same month in 2024; in Germany sales were down 76% for the same period, while Tesla’s stock price has lost almost half its value since December.

As protests have grown, the White House has rallied round Musk. Last week Donald Trump claimed the boycott was “illegal”, while Pam Bondi, the attorney general, said on Friday she would launch an investigation into vandalism against Tesla vehicles and showrooms.

. . .

In Brooklyn, people were apparently undeterred by the threat. Teslas driving past the protest were treated to a volley of boos, and lusty chants of “Sell your Tesla”. The demonstration certainly appeared to have restricted the number of people entering the dealership: the Guardian counted three customers in the space of an hour and a half.

MBFC
Archive

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tonytins@pawb.social 24 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I saw a video that suggested he is trying to pull out of Tesla and place his bets on SpaceX because of the mounting backlash.

[–] xmunk 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Atrioc is indeed pretty insightful as to the actual reasons why Tesla is viewed as an albatross - the fact that major stakeholders are selling off shares as soon as they acquire them should be a big warning sign. They are still massively over valued of course.

My takeaway is that protests and the like should start going after his other businesses especially SpaceX. His fucking fantasy is Mars and we should take that away from him.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A lot harder to go after aerospace factories and launch sites, both of which are at least "secure areas" in the commercial sense if not "restricted areas" in the national security sense.

[–] xmunk 7 points 3 days ago

I agree that it's easier to go after starlink contracts and express disappointment to those working for Musk rather than going to the sites themselves.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

His fucking fantasy is Mars and we should take that away from him.

That was a lie so he could get government contracts to build missiles. It was a fucking sales pitch.

[–] xmunk 8 points 3 days ago

Musk lies a lot so I can't be certain but I think he genuinely wants to be remembered as "The Father of Mars" or some bullshit. I think that fantasy is the real infantile Musk poking through.

[–] Zippygutterslug@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

SpaceX and Starlink are insulated from consumer sentiment, most of their money comes from huge government contracts and have already been made essential through an escalating series of frankly godawful decisions, unfortunately.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't forget that he also used Tesla to essentially but Twitter...if Tesla fails, then so does his entire social media disinformation and propaganda platform. Can't have that happening...which is why donald came 'to the rescue '

They are nothing without twitter and whatever the hell that lies circle platform he keeps using.

[–] Chef 12 points 3 days ago

I keep seeing posts that mention if Tesla hits $120 per share, it drops below the collateral level of the Twitter acquisition loan.

I have no idea how true that is but I’ve seen that number pop up multiple times across socials.

Can anyone confirm where that number is cited?

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 9 points 3 days ago

Elon is a good target (+)

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

MuskRat is starting to feel it. Keep up the pressure. There are two coming inevitablities that are going to make his life truly miserable, and perhaps even destroy it.

It is only a matter of time before the Tesla board replaces him. No matter how loyal they are to him, they will have to reign him in to avoid the blowback in the next inevitablity.

That will be a class-action shareholder lawsuit against MuskRat for his effect on the stock price. He's supposed to be some super genius, so he has no excuse for not realizing that his terrible behavior would have a detrimental effect on the stock price. Many stockholders have lost thousands, even millions, in Tesla stock, and it is only a matter of time before they sue. Besides MuskRat, they will be suing the board members individually, unless they can make the case that they tried to mitigate the damage he was doing by firing him. Even so, they stood by and watched as he cut the stock price in half, so its probably too late for board members to save themselves.

I sold my Tesla stock, but I think Ill go on Stash and buy $5 worth of stock, just so I can vote to sue Musk, Tesla, and the Tesla Board of Directors.

I guess it would be a shame if I bought way out of the money cheap ass puts on Tesla wouldn't it