this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
160 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

660 readers
50 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 5: Be excellent to each other. Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

Rule 7. No conjecture type posts (this could, might, may, etc.). Only factual. If the headline is wrong, clarify within the body.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

Video: Macklemore's new song critical of Trump and Musk is facing heavy censorship across major platforms.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In his order, Judge Christopher Cooper of U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia wrote that the Department of Government Efficiency, led by Musk, had all the hallmarks of an agency that would typically be subject to laws like the Freedom of Information Act. He said Musk’s team appeared to be exercising “substantial authority over vast swaths of the federal government,” much greater than other federal agencies that are subject to the law.

Cooper required Musk’s team and the Office of Management and Budget to turn over email correspondence between their offices that the group suing had requested, and to “begin producing documents on a rolling basis as soon as practicable.”

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Or else they will get a second stern warning!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

It will be more than that. There will be stern opinions written and people will make click bait articles about how that is important, and how the bad guys feel dejected. And I will read those, feel mild hope, and then make snarky comments.

It’s a really complicated series of events

[–] fibojoly 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

US judiciary doesn't have an enforcement arm? You know, people in uniform paid to enact the "Find Out" part of FA&FO.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

The US Marshals are responsible for executing federal writs and warrants. Marshals are quite familiar with carrying out orders from federal judges. However, administratively, the Marshals Service is an agency in DOJ and reports to the Attorney General

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

They already said it's impossible for anything their God King does to be illegal, and their God King can pardon anyone's crimes.

Therefore, legally speaking there is no "find out" to be had.

The Americans could take some lessons from the French as to what to do when they can no longer rely on the legal system to protect them.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago

Thank you Justice Cooper. It's a beginning, and more steps will need to be taken.