this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
150 points (99.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7624 readers
607 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

March 5 (Reuters) - Jack Daniel's maker Brown-Forman's CEO Lawson Whiting said on Wednesday Canadian provinces taking American liquor off store shelves was "worse than a tariff" and a "disproportionate response" to levies imposed by the Trump administration.

Several Canadian provinces have taken U.S. liquor off store shelves as part of retaliatory measures against President Donald Trump's tariffs.

Canadians are steering away from U.S. goods, sports events and trips following the recent imposition of tariffs, which have left them stirred, despite the deep ties between the two countries.

top 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago

Literally could not care less what Jack thinks about us doing what we must.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Two in the thoughts, one in the prayers.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 hours ago

That's just fucking glorious. Have some Lemmy Gold.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Im pretty sure insulting our PM and threatening to annex us is worse but what do I know…

[–] [email protected] 22 points 12 hours ago

That wasn't Jack Daniel's! That was just their owners, their customers, Tennessee's politicians, their voters, other red states...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 13 hours ago

Right? Gotta love these fuckers who only see the money side of this. The potato dick wants to occupy our communities and pillage our natural resources, and this shit stain thinks not being allowed to sell his rotten corn juice in out territory is a step to far?

We know he voted for this menace. All of these wastes of carbon did. This is what he voted for.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 hours ago

suck my dick jackie boy

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 hours ago

It says right in the article, "Canada accounts for 1% of the sales..." So I'm not one to shit on good news but I don't think days a problem for them. But that's just Jack Daniel's. Across the whole spirits, liquors, and wines industry definitely will add up.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

we deserve it tho. if you're gonna be dumb, you got to be tough

[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago

That's how I build my DnD fighters.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 13 hours ago

If you're pissed, put your influence against Trump and his horseshit tariffs. What was a disproportionate response was Canada doing nothing wrong, and America putting tariffs on their goods.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

They only have Trump to blame

[–] [email protected] 20 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They also have the Project 2025 authors and the rest of the Republican Party to blame as well.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago

Republican voters*

I don't care if they were duped, hoodwinked, brainwashed, lied to, conned, scammed, whatever. They need to take some fucking responsibility.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 12 hours ago

Not our problem your president broke the agreement.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I don't know the guy's politics, and I don't care to know them, but if you have a super generic, easily replaceable export, you should avoid presidents who fuck around, because you'll be the one who finds out.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's a terrible whiskey anyway. Go for a good Scottish or Irish single malt.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Bourbons have their place, you can't really make an old fashioned with a scotch .. I mean you can .. but you shouldn't. That said you shouldnt use Jack Daniels for one either.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Eh, Jack isn't really a bourbon. It's made with a starter but that's still not really a bourbon. That would be Jim. I don't particularly care for either, but when I was drinking, I preferred a good Irish or Scottish neat.

Occasionally I liked a cocktail with Cointreau, Tequila and lime on the rocks. I forget what it was called.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago

Jack isn't really a bourbon

It checks all of the legal boxes to be a bourbon, at least 51% corn, aged in new charred oak barrels, the aging and proof requirements, made in the US, etc.

Being "made with a starter" isn't a requirement for bourbon, and I'm honestly not even too sure what you mean by that. I assume it's probably some reference to it being a sour mash whiskey, but that's not something that factors into the legal definition of bourbon.

The only thing that arguably makes it not a bourbon is the "Lincoln County Process" of charcoal filtering it before aging in the casks, which is a requirement to be called a "Tennessee Whiskey," all the other requirements are pretty much the same as bourbon (and it's worth noting that the 2nd biggest Tennessee Whiskey brand is Prichards, which is actually located in Lincoln County, and doesn't use that process and has a grandfathered exception to that requirement)

The main nitpick is whether that Lincoln county process can be considered to add color or flavoring, because if it does that would disqualify it from being a bourbon. I'm personally of the opinion that if it's a filtering process, it's probably removing flavor and color if anything so not a disqualifier, and even if it did, in the relatively short time it's in contact with the whiskey it's probably pretty insignificant and not gonna be all that distinguishable from what the charred oak barrels are going to impact to it over the next 2+ years.

And Tennessee is really the only place that makes the Lincoln County Process a requirement for "Tennessee Whiskey" Pretty much any other government or trade organization (like NAFTA) that has a definition for it basically just leaves it at something like "a straight bourbon whiskey made in Tennessee"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago

Removing American products had very little to do with tariffs. It started after Trump threatened to invade Canada.

[–] Gullible 5 points 13 hours ago

Dang. Should have donated harder, bucko.