this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
241 points (100.0% liked)

politics

21567 readers
4098 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Treasury Department said on Sunday it would not enforce an anti-money laundering law that obliges millions of business entities to disclose the identities of their real beneficial owners.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, clearly money laundering is such a rare fraud, there's no point in wasting the Treasury's time with this...

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I saw the crypto news you posted before I shared this, and I was, like, well, that sure is a "coincidence."

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

The coincidence wears orange makeup, sports a bad blonde toupe and is openly and unashamedly a fucking grifter.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Given that Trump was talking about ‘auditing’ Ft. Knox last week.

ugh. This is the dumbest Bond movie ever.

He’s gonna steal the U.S. gold reserves, and sink its money into a crypto exchange that is just a money laundering front.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What's the difference between arbitrary rule and a proper democracy that allows the leading party to ignore the law? Asking for a friend.

[–] gravitas_deficiency 9 points 1 week ago

In the latter, rules more or less apply to everyone. In the former, rules apply to people the arbitrary ruler doesn’t like.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Funny how much money laundering is done through crypto now.

Even funnier is that if certain entities trade on certain markets, other countries will still enforce those laws.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It went from a genuine response in the wake of the 2008 recession to being exploited by right-wing grifters. Wasn't perfect, but I'll give it credit for at least trying to solve a problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What problem was it trying to solve?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

After subprime mortgages lead to yet another bubble bursting, it was thought that letting banks being responsible for our money was a bad idea. The whole idea behind crypto was thought you owned your money. Good idea in theory, but in practice it was not ready for prime... much like AI. (If ever)

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I had never heard that rationale for crypto before. It seems to be a really bad reason if I understand the logic. The value of the dollar was certainly impacted by the subprime crisis, but the dollar still had value being fiat currency issued by the US Government. Crypto currency is fiat currency issued by... a random dude (and in the case of Bitcoin, that nobody even knows). There is no value to crypto besides what someone else will give you for it. There's no intrinsic value to any of it. The rampant rug-pulls we see today in many cryptocurrencies are perfect evidence of this. Crypto "investing" seems to be predicated exclusively on the theory of the Greater Fool.

The whole idea behind crypto was thought you owned your money.

For those that really wanted that, didn't simply owning gold do that already? There's even intrinsic value to gold irrespective of which nation or national owns it in commercial, retail, and industrial applications.

The only value proposition I have ever seen for any crypto currency is avoiding national and international monetary export controls or cash repatriation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, that was definitely the rationale. Satoshi added the message, “The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks,” to the first Bitcoin block. In the early days, most of the community were Tea Party, Ron Paul, Paul Ryan, "abolish the Fed" types. There was a lot of anti-Fed propaganda floating around at that time. There was a big overlap with gold-bugs and Bitcoiners, and Bitcoin's "mining" decay curve was inspired by gold's.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm just telling you what I know.

I got into crypto because the 2008 recession threw a wrench into my 18th birthday. It was difficult to find a reliable bank and have a debit or credit card. I was desperate for any kind of financial independence at that time in my life when I should be, and sought crypto as a last resort.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was difficult to find a reliable bank and have a debit or credit card.

At 18 you certainly weren't borrowing to buy real estate, nor were you a customer for wealth management services. These were the things that hit (and sometimes sunk) banks and bank customers at the time. Are you saying you couldn't find any bank or credit union that would give you a checking account with a debit card attached to it?

How did having cryptocurrency enable you to have financial independence? Besides few places accepting crypto for promotional purposes (remember when you could buy a pizza with bitcoin?), you couldn't spend cryptocurrency on any of life's needs that would allow you to establish yourself financially.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

How did having cryptocurrency enable you to have financial independence? Besides few places accepting crypto for promotional purposes (remember when you could buy a pizza with bitcoin?), you couldn’t spend cryptocurrency on any of life’s needs that would allow you to establish yourself financially.

FFS. Go lecture my 18yr old self. I've grown up since then. I didn't say it was the correct or best option. All I said is that I was desperate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

FFS. Go lecture my 18yr old self. I’ve grown up since then. I didn’t say it was the correct or best option. All I said is that I was desperate.

My apologies, it sounded like you were still defending that choice as a correct one for an 18 year old. Certainly won't hold you accountable for your 18 year old self. I did equally (if not worse) stupid stuff in my youth.

I'm now asking about what lead to that choice, and what the value proposition of that choice looked like to 18-year-old you. As in, if you got into crypto as a replacement for a bank account for ...reasons. Did crypto accomplish anything you wanted out of a bank account? Or was it "a bank is a money place and crypto is a money place, therefore crypto is a replacement for a bank"?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is kinda a dumb question, he said

It was difficult to find a reliable bank and have a debit or credit card.

So one of his goals is to have some sort of electronic payment method, and a way to receive money electronically.

You can't buy stuff online with cash. You could potentially buy a visa gift card with crypto though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can’t buy stuff online with cash. You could potentially buy a visa gift card with crypto though.

How are you buying the crypto with your cash if you don't have a bank account though?

I don't know how common this is in other countries, but here you can go to just about any grocery store or discount store and buy a Visa gift card with cash. I would argue if you have cash the easiest way to make an online purchase (especially back then) was to buy a Visa gift card at a retail store.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago

Ok lol let's second guess the guy's teenage decision making when he's already stated it wasn't optimal

Like, this "seemed" like the best thing to do. An essay about how this dude was wrong 16 years ago isn't interesting.

You have no idea where he lived, or what was going on, it might be in his neighborhood there was a Bitcoin ATM, or check cashing places cashed to BTC or something. He might have had a wet dream about BTC and that solidified his decision. It doesn't matter.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago

hmmm i wonder why?????

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So how can a middle class person with not a lot of money take advantage of this ... asking for a friend.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Sorry best we can do is raise your taxes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Crime, unfortunately.

Money laundering is done to "clean" illegal profit (hence the name). Say your business sells a bit of a meth precursor to a high school chemistry teacher for more than it would legally. You need a way to explain the extra money, and a way to explain where than precursor went.

Things that this won't protect: sex work, drug dealing, hawking stolen goods. Things this will protect: owning a building where you were unaware every tenant was a sex worker, running logistics company that some bad apples on the exact same routes always carried packages of cocaine, or selling artifacts smuggled out of foreign countries.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Russian billionaires need their money back.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

LOL, the corruption is right there for everyone to see.

Why the redcaps think any of this clownshoes bullshit will benefit THEM is just a masterclass in brainwashing.