this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
556 points (95.4% liked)

politics

20563 readers
3791 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Secretary of State Marco Rubio grew visibly frustrated during an ABC News interview when questioned about the Trump administration’s approach to Russia.

Defending Trump’s push for peace talks with Putin, Rubio insisted negotiations were necessary but admitted the administration didn’t know Russia’s demands.

He clashed with host George Stephanopoulos over Trump’s refusal to call Putin a dictator and the U.S. siding with Russia in a recent UN vote.

Rubio also compared Trump’s handling of Ukraine to Biden’s approach to Israel, further escalating tensions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 hours ago

having the intelligence to realize, but not have the balls to speak out to the fact that the Russian Mafia just regulatory captured your country is something to melt down over.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 hours ago

The U.S. isn't placating Putin. The Republican party is. Because they're traitors.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah Biden placated netanyahu. It was bad, but for the lowest of bars, he at least was placating an ally instead of giving a hostile power everything they want and yelling at the ally they invaded

[–] [email protected] 2 points 59 minutes ago (1 children)

And placating Netanyahu and is better than finishing off that genocide with a nice ethnic cleansing

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 minutes ago

Yeah, but holy fuck I'm exhausted at the bar being that fucking low

[–] [email protected] 19 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

As a European, only the complete collapse of the Russian federation in an acceptable outcome.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago

What would be the best way for that to happen? More specifically, how can we pull this off safely?

We have very little historical precedent to go on. The USSR collapsed in 1991. There was some nervousness around what was going to happen with all their nukes. Ultimately, we ended up with Russia, led by Putin.

How would we stop Putin from triggering nuclear retaliation?
If we stop that, how do we make sure some other oligarch doesn't immediately take his place?
If Russia were to completely collapse, what would happen to Russia? Would we be willing to let China take over? If not would we be willing to maintain an indefinite occupation of Russia?

There may be good answers to all of these questions. It seems the more practical solution is to contain Russia. Do you think the EU would be ready to adopt a constitution if it came up again?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Suppose there's a cockroach colony in a residential building. Separating it into few parts is not going to do much good. If you mean that by collapse - same elites retaining power - then it's just not good enough.

And if you mean removing them, rich natural resources have proven to be good for those who have them and bad for those who don't, so no.

Turning it into a real federation or even confederation - yes. Like Germany.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

I mean the russian people doing to Putin and the oligarchs what the Libyans did to Gaddafi.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 hours ago

This guy sucking putin's asshole says what?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 hours ago

While the title is the usual nonsense, the interview is the usual nonsense delivery that the master of deals is going to save the day, when he couldn't deal his way out of a wet paper bag.

[–] Justas 14 points 11 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 26 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Rubio also compared Trump’s handling of Ukraine to Biden’s approach to Israel, further escalating tensions.

Well... that's not too far off

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

So Trump's going to give Ukraine all the weapons that they want?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago

His handling of Ukraine is like his handling of Gaza, so he'll be giving Russia all the weapons they want.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Make Vladivostok into a Ukrainian beach resort

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Hahahahahahaha. Try again

[–] [email protected] 19 points 13 hours ago

Placating? More like deep throating. The US is gluckglucking Russia and liking it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 14 hours ago

the administration didn’t know Russia’s demands.

Liar

[–] [email protected] 25 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm beginning to feel there's a fundamental disconnect between the vocabulary of everyday people and the words journalists use. I can only imagine how the dialogue goes around a journalist's house.


"Honey, have you heard about the Winstons?"
"No, why?"
"Fred from accounting SLAMMED they're planning to move to Wisconsin."
"Oh, I see. Did you GRILL him about where exactly they'd be going?"
"Yeah, I HAMMERED him with questions until he MELTED down. IN TEARS, he SCREAMED at me, 'Yeah, somewhere near Madison.'"
"...screamed?"
"You know... politely."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

"We had fun at this amazing diner. The food was out of this world!! Literally the best night of my life."

"So you had fun and ate good food?"

Feels like you gotta reach for top shelf words to keep up.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

This title is misleading. I watched the whole 9min and he was calm and collected in his delivery. Was he frustrated at the leading questions? Yes. Was he melting down? Ya no, not even close.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 18 hours ago

The Daily Beast with a bullshit, misleading, clickbait headline? Surprising.

I'm sure I downvote Daily Beast articles more than any other site. I wish people would find other sources - although the stories might not sound as exciting.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The summary is reasonable though. Again we are cutting trump and his underlings a ton of slack about his campaign claims of fixing the war in 24 hours, and 6 weeks into his presidency. No, we should not accept political hyperbole just because it comes from trump, and Stephanopoulos was rightly asking how does calling Zelenskyy a dictator (and undercutting Ukraine-supporting allies) but sucking up to putin move peace talks forward?

As I said before, the way trump makes these deals is like putting duct tape on your passenger door, calling yourself a master mechanic, and then blame next mechanic when the car falls apart.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

seems like trumps 1 day special diplomatic operation failed weeks ago

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 162 points 1 day ago (13 children)

The only person to talk about backing out of NATO since its creation has been Putin/Xi and Trump/Musk. So why wouldn't everyone think it?

NATO is Russia/China's greatest deterrent. It's literally devastating to our national security to pull out--so clearly only a bad actor would want that.... It's pretty goddamn obvious.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago

Don forget ending all US cyber operations against Russia

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 121 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (33 children)

Why can't we have a woman president? They're too emotional for politics?

Also: the emotional melt down is a tactic. This is populism trump style, none of this is unintentional

[–] RowRowRowYourBot 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Did you watch the video? He never had a melt down. He was frustrated but overall kept his cool and spouted the lies he was supposed to say.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

The headline says meltdown!! Just like a headline about my response would be ''insignificant man SLAMS Rubio for Top 10 Epic Anime Showdown interview''

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

I saw a lot of hemming and hawing, stalling, spewing bullshit, and talking over Stephanopoulos.

Not the behavior of someone "keeping his cool."

load more comments (32 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›