this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2025
105 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1651 readers
246 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 minutes ago

WTF is a PhD in health administration?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

I don't know. Seems to me "do something immoral and obviously stupid to cheat a system that people work their whole lives to participate fairly in, and then double down on the exact same bullshit when you get caught." appears to be working just fine for a lot of (rich, privileged) people these days.

At the very least Musk will hire him for his "innovative tactics" or something, if the courts and the speaking engagements/book deals don't make him rich.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

From a quick scan of some of the documents it looks like the meat of the claim here is that he didn't use AI to do the exam for him, and the normal (terrible) AI detector didn't flag it, but one of the reviewers was able to fine tune their prompt until it spat out something sufficiently similar to the suspect submission.

I don't have enough data or expertise to weigh in on whether this claim is plausible or accurate, but in either case AI looks bad. Either it allowed Mr Yang to cheat on his PhD or else it allowed an overzealous bureaucrat to invent the evidence needed to make it look like he had cheated. It doesn't take a lawyer to see how that possibility could be abused by bad-faith actors in any number of arenas.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

i don't think it helps his case that he's using chatgpt as a lawyer

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

dunno, I think it's a great contribution. not to his case, mind you, but to the collective human experience. as a warning to others, and entertainment.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

At least he lives by what he believes in for real. I kind of respect him for that.

[–] Tar_alcaran 19 points 20 hours ago

Live by the AI, die by the AI

[–] [email protected] 33 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Ten bucks says he won't learn from this loss.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

he's training to be professional healthcare denier, there were many despicable choices going back for a decade or so

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

imagine getting out of high school during or after 2008 and deciding yes i need to fuck over common people harder

[–] [email protected] 21 points 20 hours ago

Brightest economics phd

[–] [email protected] 9 points 20 hours ago