this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
385 points (98.7% liked)

politics

20393 readers
2908 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 minutes ago

I'm old enough to be very, very tired of waiting for conservatives to realize they were dumb after the fact.

It's getting old.

And here's the thing I can say with certainty because this is a reoccurring thing. They aren't going to learn from this experience. Assuming we can still vote in 4 years, we'll slingshot back to Democrat leadership, but after that conservatives will be right back where they are now. Ready and willing to vote for the next grifting authoritarian.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I always figured it would be Trump catching a bullet, but you know what, It's going to be a rep at a local event. Trump only loves Trump. He's been like this for 70+ years. However you didn't expect your reps to just go along with this craziness. Like we all agreed in the 70s that the Russian government was shit. Now we have half of the U.S. government just taking it from Russia.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago

Trump is well-protected compared to the lower-echelon fascists. Anyone seeking to create propaganda of the deed will probably look for a softer target and a bigger attack surface.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Do I believe this? I do not. I believe the people who didn't like him before are turning up to these events. Why would happy Republicans come? They're washing in lib tears, enjoying seeing what they always wanted realized.

That shit is what they're posting on Facebook. That's what they're thinking.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 hours ago

There's a lot of different people who vote for Trump.

In blue states, to like Trump you probably need to be drinking the kool aid to some degree. But in red states, there's a lot of low-info voters who are just voting how their friends and relatives votes. Until it affects them.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

It's prob a Russian sponsored account. Telling you , decapitate Russia and all this shit crawls back under a rock.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 minutes ago

decapitate Russia

We can't. The party in control, and virtually all their constituents, are cucked by Russia.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Which would be more impactful? Trump losing Putin or Putin losing Trump? Both are running a few inches ahead of a steamroller and any major breakdown of their grand plan is likely to trigger their collapse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

Maybe the original, but the guy who posted it is a friend of mine. Insane friend, but a friend.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Killing himself, presumably.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

They're all wrong, but that one is so crazy.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

"Two things can be true at the same time."

Even if people can't agree on who's lying about what, we can definitely agree that there's one and only one sitting president on our lifetime who has called himself a king.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

They love it though. They called him "God-Emperor" over at The Donald.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

I've been calling him "God-King" for years ... ironically, to shed light on the cult nature of MAGA ...

I do not like this timeline.

[–] [email protected] 136 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Bernie is getting thousands of GOP voters at his anti-Oligarchy stops. It's not a hint, it's a fucking massive revolt in their base.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Literally doesn't matter if they don't turn up and vote. Just sayin'

[–] [email protected] 1 points 36 minutes ago

Who did you vote for?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

bernie is the only one that could rally R supporters, myabe the more moderate ones, that none of the dems could.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 35 minutes ago

During the 2016 run Trump was recorded saying that Bernie was the only thing he was afraid of. Even he knew Bernie could win.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 12 hours ago

Pete Buttigieg was the only guy in the Biden admin going on Fox News and decimating then with facts. We need more of that.

[–] TheEschatonSucks 5 points 13 hours ago

Right up until Election Day when they pull a Susan Collins

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 day ago (4 children)

There’s a lot of Republican/Trump voters that just want politicians who at least sound like they want to represent them and “fix the government.” Do that and they’ll vote for you.

Democrats since Obama have failed to convincingly do that simple thing.

Meanwhile, Republicans lie that they’ll help them and get elected. They inevitably don’t help them and blame liberals/immigrants/trans etc.

If enough Democrats would follow Bernie’s lead, they would win, handily.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

Exactly and frankly it is time to primary the corporate Democrats who do nothing, the corporations showed us they are actually for what trump does. We need more people like Bernie, like AOC, like Warren, people that actually want things to improve for average people.

Also we need more younger people who would fight https://runforsomething.net/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

In red districts, primary the Republicans for twice the effectiveness. Let's be real the GOP is where the power is anyway. Kick the corporations out of the GOP and make them deal with being represented by weak democrats for a change.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 21 hours ago

Fuck Warren. She had her chance to help Sanders on two separate occasions and she chose not to. She's just better at paying lip service than the other Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The bigger problem is the latter of your comment. Republicans have no issues with lying about everything, and promising undeliverable things. It's unconscionable, but they know these people never leave their lesson and continue voting against their own interests as long as they can concoct this fascist "US v Them" narrative.

Democrats have been there out spouting the truth of the situation, but that's not enough. They need demonstrable proof to illustrate their points, and this is that. If there isn't a massive shift in voters because of this fucking mess, nothing is going to do it. Sanders and AOC are on the right track, and we need more of that. Go to where they are and talk to them. Illustrate the points and what is going to happen if they don't switch their votes.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Exactly. In order to promise to "fix the government" you need to lie to them and claim the government is broken, first. That's where liars have a leg up.

A lot of people here are developers or tech adjacent so I'll offer this strained analogy: this "the government is broken" narrative is tantamount to an intern hot off their Learning NodeJS course coming in and telling everyone that their complex production systems are trash and need to be completely rebuilt. That intern doesn't have any of the context, experience, or knowledge to make that determination and often creates conflicts within the team instead of just looking forward to the next iteration for improvement. Meanwhile, the professionals have to keep cleaning up their mess.

Elon Musk is this intern. Boebert, MTG, Tuberville, etc, are this intern. The GOP has been promoting and encouraging these interns and has since Reagan.

Can the government be improved? Absolutely. Should the interns be doing it? No.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. In order to promise to “fix the government” you need to lie to them and claim the government is broken, first. That’s where liars have a leg up.

Well, there are some broken parts of the government thst do need fixing. The courts don't have a way to enforce rulings. Laws that limit executive overreach don't have an enforcement mechanism. Too much power is concentrated in the oval office.

It is broken, but not because of spending or any of the stuff Republicans claim to be broken. It is broken because it allows for their shenanigans.

Dems could have run on fixing the actual flaws in the system that are allowing this coup, but they chose to appeal to moderates instead. In the future they could run on fixing the flaws, but would need to follow through when they have the ability.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Dems could have run on fixing the actual flaws in the system that are allowing this coup

It would have accomplished exactly nothing if they did. Voters aren't interested in "fixing the system". It would have come off as Democrats caring about nothing but "making power grabs" while ignoring kitchen table concerns such as the price of groceries. It would have come off as Democrats being more disconnected from the needs of everyday voters than they already are.

Harris, or whoever the dem nominiee would have been, would have been focusing on "fixing the system" while Trump just made all the same empty promises about "bringing down the price of eggs on day one", and he would have won by an even wider margin. Your average voter gives exactly zero shits about how things work in DC and what does and doesn't need to be fixed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

It would have come off as Democrats making nothing but "making power grabs"

Even if it didn't have that outward appearance, the liars would have lied to ensure that was the message.

Here's an example of this with Democrats trying to improve access to voting:

https://barr.house.gov/2021/3/rep-barr-denounces-house-democrats-h-r-1-the-election-power-grab-act

Rep. Barr Denounces House Democrats’ H.R. 1, “The Election Power Grab Act”

Here's Democrats trying to fix the courts:

https://www.courthousenews.com/republicans-wont-budge-as-biden-details-supreme-court-reform-plan/

“Liberals are furious that [the Supreme Court] is abiding by the Constitution,” said Oklahoma Senator Markwayne Mullin, branding court reform efforts as “a toxic power grab” chipping away at the constitutional separation of powers.

Here's the Democrats trying to give people in DC access to representation:

https://oversight.house.gov/release/hearing-wrap-up-republicans-warn-h-r-51-is-an-unconstitutional-unworkable-democrat-power-grab/

Republicans warned the Democrats’ bill is an unconstitutional power grab that will result in the District receiving greater benefits than citizens of any other state

This isn't hypothetical partisan complaining.. the past is littered with examples of Democrats attempting to do the very things that people complain they aren't doing -- with Republicans whipping up lies to feed the electorate undermining those efforts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Democrats try to win debates. Republicans try to win power.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 22 hours ago

I suspect amongst other things, this is probably a major reason Bernie is doing this tour—to demonstrate how a sane and worker-forward progressive populist message brings in a strong coalition of voters, even in states that the democrats write off as deplorable. I’m skeptical that it will change their minds, but it’s once again a reminder that continuing to shill a neo-liberal status quo message is a losing game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 23 hours ago

Bernie may just be the hero of our timeline. He’s still full of piss and vinegar. Bruh should have been Prez.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Call you democratic senator and ask them why this doesn't count as doing something and why aren't they doing this

[–] [email protected] 3 points 19 hours ago

They certainly need to be told where the hell they should visiting to some extent. The issue is that they are largely not well known in other GOP strongholds. AOC and Bernie have the recognition and credentials, but others need to fucking step it up.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I'll believe this backlash matters when Republicans in Congress start doing the simple things to ensure that President Musk and First Lady Trump abide by the law. Until then, I will assume every Republican is 100% on board with screwing their constituents.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I’ll believe in the backlash if Dems sweep the 2026 elections.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 22 hours ago

We cannot wait to stop the traitors.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago

I'll believe elections still matter if they don't get the Court to throw out the results.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Would be nice if the Democrat politicians could pull their proverbial fingers out and start soaking up en masse. Seems like right now only a few have really stepped up. This is their chance to redefine themselves to be useful activists.

Failing that, a new and very vocal movement/party to actively oppose the GOP needs to emerge. (Though I am fully aware of how difficult it is for new party's to emerge in the American political system.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

They're waiting to see if it stops without them doing anything. That's the best scenario for them.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 23 hours ago

Rather than just waiting for it to happen, we can put the pressure to make it happen. Groups like Indivisible are putting pressure on Dems to step up more and Republicans to step up at all

They pressure is starting to change dem's actions. They have started using more aggressively using some procedural tools to slow down senate confirmations (can't fully block without republican votes). For instance, they denied unanimous consent and held the floor for the 30 hours against Russel Vought (and I believe RFK too)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 22 hours ago

I'm sure that they really care about anyone's feelings now that they've been elected

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

There’s a reddit link too but I think it’s the same video.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

Please send I don’t have tiktok and the video doesn’t let me llay without the app.

load more comments
view more: next ›