this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
782 points (97.2% liked)

Memes

47120 readers
911 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago (2 children)

While the stroad seem realistic, seeing a pedestrian carrying groceries doesn't seem like americana iconography.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Blocking the road is not a valid form of protest! runs over pedestrian 🀠

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Liberals will kick and scream about the fascism of Tianamen without stopping to ask why the Tank Driver stopped and even tried to drive around Tank Man without success.

The idea that an American civilian could survive getting that close to a military vehicle - that this kind of protest wouldn't be used to justify his murder - is utterly alien to the Western brain.

So much of this image is pregnant with what Americans understand a US police officer would do to an unarmed protester. You'll never see pictures of what happened next, because it flies in the face of the narrative.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Look up the Bonus Army, one of many protests that were brutally stomped on by the US military and police.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It says Times Square. Manhattan is one of the walkable places in the US where carrying groceries is actually something you can see.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Good point.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 5 days ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

the murican cops are all fucking disgusting violent fascist pigs.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

Always was like that

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Wasnt expecting to see the news dude at the end of . . Wow that was depressing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Anegro_Montoya 17 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I like the image and messaging. I was thinking of calling them Cybercucks.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Both. Not all swasticars are Cybercucks, but all Cubercucks are swasticars.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Some folks call them Deploreans.

[–] __nobodynowhere 3 points 5 days ago

Cybercuck is a better name for Elon than the truck, but Trump is the cuck in their relationship. Iunno.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Tesla would be screwed the first time they see a new sign. Machine Learning is about learning from the past but if you don't have seen it before you might be screwed. But humans can actually think,. even stop and Google the new sign.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Not Times Square, should be Lafayette Square.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

no that's just silly

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Somehow I knew that this would be controversial here. It's a very funny meme though

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (3 children)

It isn't that controversial actually, seems pretty unified with only a couple people getting upset.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (11 children)

Another ironic example of Westerners not understanding what tank man was actually doing: stopping the tanks from leaving Tianmanmen Square. He was doing the opposite of an act of defiance against government involvement; he wanted them to be involved. Also, he left the scene unscathed when other civilians came and scurried him away: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq8zFLIftGk

Maybe Western media always show us a cropped version of the tank man photo, with Tianmanmen Square removed, because it doesn’t fit in with their narrative.

[Edit to replace deleted YouTube video.]

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Jesus fucking christ. I watched this shit happen. I watched the uncut footage air. That man was fucking pissed. He kept blocking the tanks while absolutely losing his shit screaming at the tank. Neither of us was there so neither of us knows why or what he was screaming but it was most definitely a clear act of defiance. You cannot in any way say that he was asking them to "go back" and "stay involved".

Here is the footage.

https://media.gettyimages.com/id/450068672/video/a-lone-man-stops-a-convoy-of-tanks-during-the-tiananmen-square-protests-in-beijing-1989.mp4?s=mp4-640x640-gi&k=20&c=CCERCYPtGDpeNsNsDmVMA5LAovD-byP0E_f4d1oHzgA%3D

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago

That’s just a shorter version of the video I posted. And I don’t think the full footage ever aired on TV, because it’s around ten or twenty minutes long, mostly of him on top of the tank having a conversation with the crew.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

We have reached so many levels of irony that I do not know which one the original meme maker was on.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

https://zezvaz.com/about/

I assume he doesn’t know because almost no Westerners seem to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Probably but the irony adds a layer of comedy. By the way the video you linked above seems to be broken.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

There's a lot of misinformation about this event, which was formally acknowledged by the USA fairly recently. He did leave unharmed, I was surprised to hear anybody thought otherwise. However, you are stretching credulity by claiming he was pro-government. Seeing as he was never located, I can at least concede that neither of us know what he was thinking at the time.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Hah, the video must have been taken down last week. I figured it might eventually be.

Here’s another: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qq8zFLIftGk

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Upon watching the video then reading further, they seem to have left the square to clear nearby streets. Your comment says he wanted them to stay. Therefore you’re saying he wanted them not to continue clearing the area? Or are you saying he wanted them to continue to maintain the square?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

He seems to be blocking their exiting the square, so it appears he wanted them to remain in it. I don’t know where the tanks were going. Perhaps back to base, perhaps somewhere else.

Edit to add: Back to base seems most likely, because this was on June 5th, the day after the protests had ended.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

I think he was just a weirdo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

they seem to have left the square to clear nearby streets

That sounds so strange, how do we expect them to clear entire streets if they can't even get past a single guy armed with grocery bags?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The video you linked to says that the footage was spliced together from a 2006 documentary aired by PBS, here's a summary

The Incident: On June 5, 1989, a day after the Chinese army violently suppressed pro-democracy demonstrations in Tiananmen Square, an unarmed man, later known as "Tank Man," stood his ground in front of a line of tanks on the Avenue of Eternal Peace.

Iconic Image: Captured by Western journalists, this image became a powerful symbol of defiance and the struggle for freedom worldwide.

Documentary's Focus: The FRONTLINE documentary, "The Tank Man," explores the events surrounding the Tiananmen Square protests, the identity of "Tank Man," and the significance of his act of defiance. Filmmaker's Investigation:

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

They were not pro-democracy lmfao they were maoists protesting against SWCC

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί