this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
25 points (93.1% liked)

3DPrinting

16315 readers
107 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: or [email protected]

There are CAD communities available at: [email protected] or [email protected]

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is there a small printer with ease of use and quality comparable to the A1 mini?

I was gonna get that one but the drama with BL has got me looking for alternatives.

My priorities are ease of use (no tinkering) and small size

Thanks!

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

For what it's worth, I got a P1S for Christmas and have been using it almost exclusively in Lan only mode with OrcaSlicer with no issues. I honestly think the drama is a bit overblown.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Bambu lab A1 is still the best for your usecase if no tinkering

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The Prusa Mini is always worth recommending.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

This. Had a mini since they were released and it’s been a low maintenance workhorse. Prusa adding input shaping, etc. via firmware was just icing on the cake.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sure it's similar size and kinematics, but if they're expecting similar UX and speed as the BL A1 from the Prusa mini they're in for a nasty disappointment.

IMO there are currently not really any direct replacement to BL printers, you'll have to sacrifice on speed, UX or both no matter which printer you get. I hope someone will pick up with the gap in the market since BL did their switcheroo.

Edit: maybe Qidi is pretty close to a direct replacement, but I haven't used those.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Noting that the ease of maintenance and speed will be much lower on the Prusa. But otherwise is a great machine.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The Qidi X-Smart 3 leaps to mind, if nobody is offended by my constant shilling of Qidi printers. (Not for any particular reason other than having owned two, and having no trouble with them in contrast with other machines.)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The X smart 3 is no longer available. Much to my sadness, I was going to buy one and it's no longer available. Not surprising due to most consumers wanting bigger and bigger printers.

There are really only choices in this size range any more that are actually decent. There are a couple of 'build it yourself' models out there, but most won't want to be bothered to do so. So the A1 Mini and the Prusa Mini are about it. It would be nice if someone else stepped up an made a good budget 180^3^ sized printer.

And yes, sadly I did end up with the Bambu Mini.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Well, that's annoying.

[–] huskypenguin 4 points 1 week ago

I'm here to shill with you. Qidi is looked over and is an amazing bang for your buck.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Quality and construction? Cetus mk3

ease of use? definitly not a Cetus mk3

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I heard about the Creality Hi Combo from Frankly Built. It's a blatant copy of the A1 Mini but with a better AMS system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I would not trust Crealty. They have a long ways to go to get over the "We don't care about customers" And the "We got your money, now get out of here. You bother me kid" mentality. They've sold too much junk for too long.