this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
422 points (99.5% liked)

Curated Tumblr

4241 readers
367 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

The best transcribed post each week will be pinned and receive a random bitmap of a trophy superimposed with the author's username and a personalized message. Here are some OCR tools to assist you in your endeavors:

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mouselemming 15 points 1 week ago

Babies in protective escape pods, like a bunch of little Kal-Els.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Pollen kind of is analogous to semen in a very broad sense, though, in as much as the pollen grain produces (rather than carries) sperm and delivers it to the ovule, right? It's not the same when examined closely, but that's the point of analogies. Grainy semen.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean sort-of but not. Matrotrophy evolved independently, so there is no relationship between the "smaller, mobile gametophyte" in plants and the "small mobile gamete" in animals. It's just coincidence/ convergence.

And we know that it absolutely is coincident/ convergence, because in the evolutionary ancestors of vascular plants, its the haploid phase that form large bodies, and the diploid phase that analogous to sperm/pollen and eggs/megasporangia.

So like, mosses, green algae, red algae. They do things very differently than vascular plants.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I won't argue the point further than this message, and I appreciate the details you've provided, but the point of analogies is drawing parallels to quickly aid understanding at a surface level.

Nothing analogous to finding a needle in a haystack actually involves rooting through dry grass for a sliver of metal, but the analogy still stands.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The limits of metaphor are when they do more to disguise than to explain.

We shouldn't confuse things that can be difficult or require significant study to understand or explain with convenient but wrong stories.

If a metaphor fails the first test, than we shouldn't use it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I agree - but parallels can be a quick and effective way to communicate information where the specifics aren't important, even if they have to be consciously discarded for someone diving further into the detail.

[–] phdepressed 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right but the poofy dandelions aren't pollen they're seeds.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Sure, but OP's image says:

hell, pollen isn't analogous to sperm,