Woof, they couldn’t even wait 1 week before blowing this load? Impressive
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
113 points (93.1% liked)
politics
19634 readers
2925 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Obama would beat the pants off of Trump.
Obama would still be unable to run, the amendment would only let people with two non consecutive terms have a third go.
I believe they wrote it so they won't happen "2 consecutive terms" clause
Why? Because he beat a couple of old school moderate Republicans? He barely managed to beat Romney. Obama has charm, but he's not the powerhouse people think he is. He was a weak milquetoast president, and exactly the old style type politician that America has flat out rejected.
Democrats need to wake the fuck up. Returning to the old ways is not going to get us out of this mess. Obama and the Democratic establishment led us here.
"Barely"? He won by 4% pts and won Ohio and Florida including all blue wall states. I don't know about barely. Keep in mind Obama was still recovering the country from the financial crisis and Republicans were constantly trying to pin the economy on him.
The Republicans always blame a Democratic president for the economy. Biden had a good economy and they found a reason to run on blaming him anyways.
Obama ran as a reformer in 2008 and won with a 7% margin. After capitulating to Wall Street, that margin was cut nearly in half.
Winning Florida and Ohio wasn't as big a deal back then. Both used to be Democratic strongholds that had become swing states very recently. It's thanks to the Democratic establishment that both are now solidly Republican.
Proposed Amendment that will never be considered No.10365475344
It's meant to endear this sycophant to Trump so he gets in line for a cabinet position when it comes out that he has ethical issues some journalist is about to expose.
no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.
Wut.
They don’t want Obama to come in and spoil it
This is (some of) the language of the current amendment, the difference being the replacing of "once" with "twice" as the last word. The idea is that if you're VP and are elevated to be President, it counts as one of your two possible terms if you serve more than half of the term you took over during. Basically, this kiss ass waste of space just copy/pasted the existing amendment and incremented every number in it.
Have you done any of the following?
- Been President for two terms?
- Been Acting President for 2+ years for two separate Terms?
- Been Acting President for 2+ years for one term term, and also President for another term (or vice versa)?
If you answered yes to any of these, you can't be elected to the Presidency again.
Elaborating on what an "Acting President" is... if, for whatever reason, the sitting president cannot perform their duties, they can transfer their power voluntarily to their VP, either temporarily or indefinitely. Those reasons could be health or cognitive issues, or any number of other things. The President then remains President, but the VP will be the Acting President until such time as the President can perform their duties again. Essentially, they decided that if a guy serves the majority of the term as acting President, you were essentially just President when it comes to term limits.
Oh you lot with your "he can't do that because of laws/the constitution". It's adorable.
That's a permutation of language in the original amendment. If a sitting president dies with more than two years left in the term, the new president (former vice president) can only run for reelection once, per the current amendment. This changes it to twice (10 total years as president)
Jesus fuck, that is patently insane. 🙄 The biggest problem with Biden is that he was a vegetable the entire time. People were even expecting him to die in office, or have the 25th Amendment used on him.
Trump is not young, either. The presidency wears down men, just look at Obama before & after. And now we're talking about blowing up how everything works, eschewing the 22nd Amendment, and for what?? For a chance for an incredibly old Trump to run again, and likely lose? Big brain time, here.
Get this loser Andy Ogles out of office; he's drunk or incompetent. Time for him to get a real job.
Isn't trump as old as Biden was last election. But nobody is calling him old and feble.
This dude is just pandering to Trump for... Federal funding? Clout? A promotion? Who knows
For sure this would never pass. It's posturing and distraction like so much else in this clownfuck's world