I'll never understand why people pit these two franchises against each other lol Other than the fact that they're both set in space I fail to see the point of the comparison... They're both fun to watch!
this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
54 points (79.3% liked)
Star Wars Memes
11872 readers
350 users here now
Hello there. Somehow, Star Wars memes have returned. It's not a trap, this is where the fun begins.
==========
Other universes to visit:
Separatist systems:
Oh hey some real SW content for a change (perhaps):
==========
IMPORTANT
Please do not post the "good friend" or similar copypasta
==========
Our galactic citizens have requested more specific rules, so here are a few.
The general idea is, if you're looking here for rules, you're probably someone who doesn't need to have them spelled out. You're fine. But anyway:
-
This is a community for Star Wars memes. This means typically screenshots of Star Wars media with some text or context that's meant to be funny and/or thoughtful. All SW media is welcome: movies, games, comic books, fanart... Other kinds of content, like video links or meta memes (about this community, or Lemmy), are fine as well, just keep it on topic.
-
We are all friends here, and love (sometimes love to hate) Star Wars. Be nice to each other.
-
As fans of fictional media, we can be passionate. If you very strongly disagree with something or someone, take a deep breath before reacting. Anger leads to the dark side!
-
Everything in Star Wars has happened a long time ago, in a galaxy far away, and it's a rich universe of millions of words and millions of years of history. So current Earthly matters really shouldn't concern us here. In other words, leave politics, philosophies and convictions behind the door. This applies even if it's about something related to Star Wars.
-
Original content is preferred. Reposts are fine, just please limit to a maximum of 3 per day, per citizen. It is recommended, but not required, to mark original memes as (OC) and reposts as (repost).
-
Local mods are the Jedi council. They may take actions that are necessary to maintain peace and stability of the Republic, even beyond the rules outlined here. Follow their guidance.
-
Regular rules of the Lemmy.world instance apply.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Bc blah blah "dramatic tension" blah blah.:-D
More like melodramatic tension, amirite?
Them being in space really is the only comparison. I wouldn't expect to see something like Let That Be Your Last Battlefield to feel like a good Star Wars story in the same way that I wouldn't expect Riker and Picard to fight each other with laser swords atop planetary Mt Doom while screaming their feelings at each other after 2 movies of building up their relationship.
How many crossovers can we squeeze into this?
I mean, some people will agree and others will disagree because ultimately the two series are quite different from each other.
Star Trek is for the people that like hard science fiction. They want the technical explanation why something happens or how it works.
Star Wars is for the people that don't really care about hard science fiction. There might be a scentific explanation for something or there might not be. The people that like Star Wars aren't really going to care if it isn't explained.
As for me, I like both for different reasons. Though I don't really like either series after ~2012.
That's true... but also in a different orthogonal sense Star Wars looks more "realistic" than Trek bc of its heavy leaning into politics. Slavery exists for example, instead of everyone living in a post scarcity society where people have suddenly decided to share resources.
But mostly yes ofc, bc laser swords wielded by space wizards is just the realm of high fantasy, as opposed to "reverse the polarity!":-)
A bigger difference IMO was that Star Trek attempted to make commentary on real world social issues, whereas Star Wars did not. Star Wars was a fantasy story about good versus evil, it did not try to comment on the real world. Well, pre~2012 mostly, anyways.
Star Trek, I mean the old good Star Trek from pre~2012 and not its most modern iterations, could logically present an episode that was very obviously about X or Y real world social issue. So far, same as modern Star Trek so why do I differentiate them? Well, old Star Trek did not feel compelled to tell its viewers the "correct" answer, or how to think. The episode would present the viewer with an issue, and then it would usually spend time explaining both sides of the issue. Then, the crew of the Enterprise would make their choice, and explain why they chose that answer. It was not about "this is the correct answer," it was mostly about getting the viewer simply to think. To use their brain. Form their own opinion just like the Enterprise crew did. If someone disagreed with what the Enterprise crew chose, they did not feel like the show writers were calling them unsavory names. The viewer simply felt like they didn't agree with the Enterprise crews choice, but that did not make them stop watching the show because they felt insulted. They would tune in next week to see what happened next.
This is where I think modern Star Trek goes wrong. The last two or three episodes I tried to watch featured character assassination, bad writing in general, lore inaccuracies, but also it tried to tell the viewer how to think, or what the correct answer was, at the same time insulting the viewer if they chose any other answer than whatever was decided in the show. The only one that I didn't get this feeling from and actually still liked a bit was the Lower Decks animated comedy.
One thing I disagree with there is that the OG Star Wars did seem to try to warn against the decadence of bureaucratic systems - their wastefulness, their slowness, their corruption, and especially vulnerability to takeover and being converted into authoritarian regimes, etc. I think the real, deeper message of Star Wars was that despite how it may appear to a naive view from a first glance, there really is not just one right way to do things. Again, as you said, in the older ones.
This ofc came across way better in the books, and you can strongly and probably successfully argue that George Lucas simply wanted money and fame and saw none of this himself. Except that it's the tale of history, like Rome, so it's not even his telling just his borrowing existing elements so that space wizards could have laser sword fights:-).
It is a fascinating thought to consider though: the Jedi were "good", but turned a blind eye to evil and then were slaughtered, so ultimately what good were they? Conversely the Sith were "evil" and yet they brought order and stability to the galaxy... except they didn't bc the Rebellion was disruptive (but was it though, or was it a counter force used to provide a reason to sell the masses on the need for order?) and then ultimately Vader turned to love and overthrew the emperor. So... ah... TLDR: Yin Yang saved the day?
I see an extreme amount of parallels with e.g. Trump, rising as an emperor out of the fallen systems of democracy, not in spite of but seemingly directly at the behest of The People. And not to fight a real enemy so much as a manufactured one. Star Wars was fortunately not all that relevant to the 1970s era, while the 1960s Star Trek and later renditions in like the 90s really inspired people, relegating Star Wars to mere fantasy. But looking back in hindsight... there was a lot that we could have learned from, if only we had been open to it.
Star Wars was not so obvious in its real world parallels as Star Trek was.
I did not mean that Star Wars contained absolutely no "message" about ethics or morals. All entertainment art contains a message. As humans, it is not possible to create entertainment that is completely void of this, as such a piece of media cannot entertain a human. (Just to clarify, I mean entertainment art that has a storyline. Tetris, for example, is entertaining as a puzzle game, but it does not have a story. Tetris would therefore be excluded). Rather, Star Wars did not present real world social issues to its audience in the way that Star Trek did.
The Jedi were good, but also demonstrated that a person that becomes too imbalanced can also become just as evil as a Sith. Star Wars also showed that even an evil Sith can change their mind and become good again. Fantastic messages that are easy to understand and applicable to any person, place, or time.
Star Trek, on the other hand, openly debated the benefits of something like religion or slavery. Still timeless messages, but presented in a very different way. An alien race would believe a religion or have slaves, and the benefits of such would be clearly presented. Maybe the aliens were happier with a religion or their economy was reliant on slaves to continue otherwise their world would fall into economic collapse or whatever. Then the Enterprise crew would talk about the down sides, maybe the religion was oppressive, or the obvious downsides of slavery. Usually, in the end the crew of the Enterprise would choose to not interfere with the aliens, for fear of damaging their culture or something. They never made an "evil" choice, but they never made a choice that caused the viewer to feel like the writers of the show were telling them how to think.
I will make an exception this one time, but I have a personal policy to block anyone talking about current world politics. I will not engage in that discussion myself, because I do not want to.
Definitely Trek is presented more logically so sci-fi whereas Wars was more emotional so fantasy. And definitely world politics is a bit heavy lately.
Well, considering much, if not most, of Star Trek takes place outside the Federation... no, not everyone is living in a post scarcity society. And slavery does exist. They just approach it from an analytical point of view, rather than an adventurous one.
I like that phrasing: Star Wars is more "dramatic". Although it got fairly deep into politics too, which I think most people simply glazed over. The perils and vulnerability of democracies to authoritarian takeovers from within definitely sounds a tiny bit familiar these days, though would have fallen more on deaf ears ~50 years ago.
I mean, it wouldn't have fallen on deaf ears to those it kept happening to, just not in the US.
Definitely that's what I meant, mainly bc whereas today shows are shared with an international audience I at least assumed that back then they were meant primarily for the local ones they were made for, then shared only as an afterthought.
Not even that - I saw this on the internet and decided to share bc I thought it was funny:-).
That's like saying apples are better than oranges. The two franchises share no similarities, other than being set in space.
Better at what? Being science fiction or fantasy?
What if I told you, Morpheus is saying "I won't lie to you", and never said "what if I told you"?
I wonder why the meme changed it, perhaps to be shorter or more readily received.
It's been that way for well over a decade, probably based on the vibe of Morpheus breaking the illusion of the Matrix to Neo without actually quoting it correctly.
KYM kinda confirms that theory, paraphrasing the idea of the scene without quoting it directly. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/matrix-morpheus
Let's get you to bed