this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
401 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19623 readers
2881 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 192 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

He can confess to multiple murders and show the bodies on stage and nothing will happen. The US "justice" system only applies to poor people.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And Democrats. You're going to see the DOJ move at light speed now. Moved at glacial pace with the previous administration but now that vindictive retaliation is on the menu they're going to give Sonic a run for his money.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 132 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here we go again. Even when he's literally found guilty, it makes no difference because there's just not the will to make it stick.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Get the message: the system will not save us from Trump.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 week ago

We need a Luigi.

[–] Bakkoda 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ding ding ding. Constitution? Basically a system. Justice department? A system. They have failed. We keep pretending like a super hero is gonna show up, correct it all then vanish again for another 50 years.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Rise Washington rise! Welp I tried.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 101 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It doesn't fucking matter. He can splatter an infant against a tree like an old testament god and nothing will ever happen then either.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago (4 children)

None of this defeatist bullshit. It matters.

https://lemmy.world/c/keeptrack

Keep track. Or don't keep track and keep it out of your head for your health.

Just no defeatist bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh come on... Maybe in 2020 you could get away with this blind positivity but at this point you're just denying reality.

Keep track has existed pretty much since Trump first showed up, "we've" accomplished fuck-all. We did however elect a feckless piece of shit who picked another feckless piece of shit to run the DOJ and together they also accomplished fuck-all.

Trump is going to get away with literally everything, as he already has, save for some state level civil b.s he can't use the DOJ to make go away.

Defeatist or blind positivity, none of it matters. We have no control. You can, as I have, and many others, shout from the rooftops of all the shit we've kept track of, but as long as fox news exists, as long as Elon keeps buying social media to control, we will have next to 0 impact getting people to realize.

Honestly keeping with what I've just said, even this means nothing and has no real purpose. I think "keep track" just triggered me. It's all useless.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Sorry, we can't prosecute a sitting president. It's tradition.

[–] xmunk 9 points 1 week ago

Fiddler on the roof intensifies

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 week ago (16 children)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

"He knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers, those vote-counting computers, and we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide.

Except that Elon actually doesn't know shit about computers. Trump is just rambling delusionally like usual.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wish people would stop conceding even that about Elon. The guy is not some technical whiz at anything that I can discern.

Does he even have a real degree?

Virtually all of the self-created myth about Elon seems to be complete bullshit.

[–] ryathal 7 points 1 week ago

Elon musk is great at buying companies that could be promising and getting them to massively grow. It's likely mostly about being able to secure funding, but it's something I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Elon dazzels Trump with tales of setting the correct time on all sorts of video players.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Right, who's going to hold a cabal of the richest men on Earth accountable?

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"He knows those computers better than anybody. All those computers, those vote-counting computers, and we ended up winning Pennsylvania like in a landslide."

Trump is so old he probably means human computers. They were still around when he was a young man. Right? He meant the people counting the votes, right? Heaven forbid he actually tried to monkey with the voting machines. Because that would be illegal, and totally unthinkable for someone with a stainless reputation like His Orangeness...

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don't assume there's anything meaningful behind what he says. His algorithm is mind-numbingly simple: say stupid shit. If it gets attention, double down.

That's all there is. There is no thought and no feeling. He has no more inner life than a cockroach.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

say stupid shit. If it gets attention, double down.

And that's exactly how he gets away with all the stuff he does: people simply assume he's talking crap, until they realize he wasn't.

Trump should not be allowed to say anything remotely controversial without meeting fact-checking and extreme resistance at each and every step. Either that'll teach him to be careful with what he says, or he'll eventually get caught incriminating himself. If people let him say any old thing because of the sheer volume of bullshit coming out of his piehole, he's gonna keep getting away with everything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The one thing I know in my heart and in my soul is these guys will fuck something up so badly that their own base will demand they be torn to shreds before these 4 years are up.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (8 children)

As he said, many years ago now, "I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody, and I wouldn't lose any voters, OK?"

These people do not care about rules, they do not care about law, they do not care what is good for them and those they care about. They care about owning the dems.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The base will never turn against trump, never

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Whatever Trump fucks up, they'll just blame it on democrats

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah remember that analysis by some data scientists that said there was some fishy shit going on?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Do you have a source? I don't remember it and I'm not turning much up by searching.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here is the article that was published about it.

Bullet ballots, and starlink

Take it with a grain of salt. But the dots are starting to line up.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It looked reasonable on the surface, largely because of the "factual" claims he made. But as soon as you start peeking into the publicly available numbers, it falls apart. He said 11% bullet ballots in NC. It was around 2.2%. That's the one I verified myself.

In North Carolina, which saw 11% of votes for Trump cast as bullet votes.

NC had 5.67m presidential votes. NC had 5.54m gubernatorial votes. A difference of 128k. 128k/5.67m = 2.257%

I checked a couple other NC races as well. It doesn't get close. Not to mention places like NYC went more red too. Do we think they cheated in NYC too? Did they cheat literally everywhere?

Of course the bullet ballot guy makes the claim that the swing states and the surrounding states are different, but they really weren't. His numbers are just lies.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

That guy neverehad a source to make the claims that he did. Rebecca Watson addressed this guy's claims

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's only day 1. I can't wrap my head around 4 more years of this shit.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It didn't help it's already been 8 years of this shit. Even losing he never shut the fuck up. Ever.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I hope I live long enough to read his obituary

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago

Therefore it would be technically impossible to hack voting machines since the paper trail would not match up. Wishful thinking though."

Yeah if you ask for a recount. The one the DNC never bothered with.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Some people may think that, but from the video it is not clear. He just mentions Elon knows computers very well. There will be enough real news with president Trump, we don’t need this kind of journalism.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It sounds like standard demented Trump. Musk -> Technology -> Computers -> Voting Machines -> Hey, everybody remember, how I won the election?!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Pretty sure nothing can or will be done about it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

In this case, unfortunately, the past is indeed indicative of the future. Oh and by the way, fuck you Merrick Garland you useless quisling and coward.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Oh good. Because that matters.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

good thing he's, by law, above the law

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Pennsylvania alone would not have flipped it.

312 to 226.

Flip Pennsylvania:

293 to 245.

Still 25 short of a win. PA+MI+WI were required and she blew all three, just like Clinton did.

load more comments
view more: next ›