this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
455 points (95.0% liked)

Technology

60359 readers
4673 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 minutes ago

Here on Lemmy, people who claim to advocate for freedom of speech and information, demanding for social networks to be shutdown and people to be censored based on unknown and ambiguous criteria, without even understanding the implications of it.

Details at six

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 minutes ago

The same people with toddler brain and "it's not fair!!!"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Advertising is hateful content. Ban the entire marketing industry now please.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 35 minutes ago

The majority of advertising we see in the US should be banned for sure. It is just thinly veiled psychological fuckery designed to manipulate us. Not cool.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 minutes ago

These are platforms. It isn't censorship because they are private for-profit entities. They can host or deny any speech they want. And we can post on them or not and take our content elsewhere.

[–] brown567 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like it is still censorship, but a degree of censorship required for public safety is tolerable...

Unless he's saying that social media sites policing content on their platform isn't censorship, because it's not. It's only censorship if it's a government doing it, you have the right to control what is said on a platform you own

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It's only censorship if it's a government doing it

The amount of public space, both real and virtual, is decreasing dramatically. I think limits on private censorship should definitely exist.

[–] brown567 2 points 1 hour ago

Excellent point

[–] [email protected] 28 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

Censorship or not, tolerance is a social contract, and those who want to undo this system must be stopped by any means possible. Content moderation is actually the compromise.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 4 points 3 hours ago

That depends on who's doing the moderation. If it's a government entity, that's censorship, and the only time I'm willing to accept it is if it's somehow actively harmful (i.e. terrorist plots and whatnot). If it's merely disgusting, that's for private entities to work out, and private entities absolutely have the right to moderate content they host however they choose.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

Some might call it a.. what's that word? Responsibility?

Like that whole neighbor and community upstanding injustice and leveraging their privilege for the have nots thing that has defined modern human society up until Cambridge Analytica?

load more comments
view more: next ›