But you uttered an opinion about moderation. So address my point.
big_fat_fluffy
Most? Well not my conversations.
Maybe it's a smalltalk vs "largetalk" thing. Maybe most conversations are smalltalk. Talk that's just friendly noise or whatever.
That is a territory with which I am pretty unfamiliar.
But ya, 2 totally different kinds of talk.
Maybe trolling constitutes a 3rd variety.
Well there is no clean connection between the rule and reality (short of forbidden word lists anyway). It's always a matter of somebody's interpretation.
Some communities have rules like "don't be a dick", which seems implied.
Maybe rules are inappropriate here. At best a justification.
Actually it ain't. Good, catch
What if they got off topic. What would happen?
Also, do you think that you understand their conversation better than they do? All of them?
But it's a very good guideline for people who, like moderators, have power and imperfect understanding. It's saying, "when in doubt, err on the side of least possible harm". So that's a good guide. Right?
Instead of doctors we'd have AI controlled animatronics doing the deed.
be in the community but secretly ...
Oh that will work out just fine.
Bigotry
That is a very popular word lately
So you want to shape us.
How about just letting us talk?
But if they're saying the wrong stuff then I get to hit them with my modhammer. Right?
Influence, narrative-control, hurting the other tribe, control over a little domain. Those are good pay for some people.
Do you think it's a conscious plan to mindcontrol everybody or is it just a basement dweller treating his mod powers like the ultimate downvote?