this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
65 points (90.1% liked)

memes

10861 readers
4239 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago

Then why make a shampoo for cars and pets?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

It can be funny when the legal department's Cover-Your-Ass labelling conflicts with marketing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 16 hours ago

They forgot to warn you about not using it as shampoo. They're so getting sued.

[–] ricecake 13 points 20 hours ago

This doesn't even seem like the most egregious "weird warning".
Thinking you can use a pet urine cleaner for fibres on a shaggy dog isn't madness, it's just "nope, actually a skin irritant".

[–] [email protected] 15 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

it's to protect themselves from a lawsuit.

these warnings aren't added retroactively to protect customers, they're added proactively to save on court settlements.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago

Sometimes, but not always.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

Correction....

they're added retroactively as a result of the first court case

  • all safety rules are written in blood
[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

Ive heard about the dog owner who washed thier dog, and used the microwave to dry it. Didnt end well.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago

"My dirty pet was in the car, so..."