this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
167 points (99.4% liked)

World News

39605 readers
1501 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Russia loses 30,000 working-age citizens annually to HIV, with 1.7 million total infections and nearly 500,000 deaths to date.

The epidemic strains the economy as treatment costs reach $670 million annually, compounded by shortages of antiretroviral drugs and gaps in early testing.

Heterosexual transmission now dominates, though marginalized groups like drug users, sex workers, and gay men remain disproportionately affected.

Reduced funding for HIV testing and inconsistent treatment availability hinder efforts to curb the epidemic, posing critical public health and economic challenges for Russia.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)

“If each year we lose 30,000 young, able-bodied people who could work for another 20-30 years, that is an additional loss [to the economy],” he said.

Depressing that it has to be explained in terms of the economy to get people to care.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Caring and prioritizing may be different. Having concrete numbers can enable decision makers to convince others.

Something being the right thing to do is not a convincing argument.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think you just described the sad thing perfectly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Gotta make some judgements for human lives/money at some point.

E.g. safety at you place of work. There is some middle ground between working naked at a steel smelter and covered in protective gear at your desk job. Some times people have differing opinions.

The mean value of a Russian life is rather low. So it may actually seem close to some.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are they still in the HIV denial phase? That’s about 40 years behind. The rest of the world has a couple people cured and are close to a vaccine.

[–] gravitas_deficiency 37 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They stopped tracking HIV deaths a decade or two ago when it became apparent that the Russian government doesn’t fucking care, largely because they are thinking of it in a (hilariously ironic) Reagan-esque mentality of it being a “gay disease”. And the Russian government HATES gay people.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

For comparison, in the US, annually, about 5,000 people die from HIV as the underlying cause, and another 8,000 die from HIV as a contributing cause. https://www.kff.org/hivaids/fact-sheet/the-hiv-aids-epidemic-in-the-united-states-the-basics/

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The US has double the population as well...

[–] fibojoly 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And third world health care, mostly.

[–] Grilipper54 3 points 4 weeks ago

For now Prep is free for most people though which probably helps a lot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What? The healthcare is good the healthcare system is bad

[–] fibojoly 4 points 1 month ago

You have an embarassed billionaire healthcare.
"It's the best in the world! I just don't have access to it right now. But once I do, you'll see!" they say, trying to decide between bleeding to death and the ambulance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If that isn't an oxymoron, it's as close as it gets.
A healthcare system not providing healthcare can't be said to have good healthcare.
Just because SOME people receive good healthcare, doesn't mean the healthcare is good overall or on average.

Maybe it could hypothetically be the case that the system is bad but the care is good overall, but that is certainly NOT the case regarding healthcare in USA.
It's absolutely justified to say healthcare in USA is on the level of a third world country. Cheap rhetoric doesn't change that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Yes we rank 173/227 in infant mortality.
It's so great more than 50 other countries beat us at keeping baby's alive to a year old.

And that's data reported by us, so if they could skew it to make us look better, I'm sure they would have.

https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/infant-mortality-rate/country-comparison/

Looking elsewhere it appears we ranked 55th in keeping them alive to 5 years old as well. Not to great