this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
59 points (94.0% liked)

Games

32933 readers
1002 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I guess we'll still need mods for FromSoftware games.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sendpicsofsandwiches 42 points 4 days ago

"Yay a fromsoft coop game! I sure hope there aren't any arbitrary rules for online play like they usually do!"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

I remember when Nintendo took the same approach with The Legend Zelda Tri Force Heroes game... I don't think it worked out that great...

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's still unclear to me if you are always a trio.

Is "solo" you + 2 bots?

Can you play as 2 friends + 1 bot or 1 random player?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 days ago (3 children)

From the original interview:

IGN: Sure. [Laughs] Back to the game, one thing that wasn’t clear to me yesterday. Do you have to play it online in a group of three, or can you also play it solo or in a duo?

Junya Ishizaki: The game is designed to be played as a three-person team, but you can play it as a solo player.

IGN: Oh, great. Or in a pair?

Junya Ishizaki: No, it's either one-player or three-player.

So it's either single player or three humans.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago (2 children)

That's so weird. Why not give an option for two? What if a lot of players only know one other player? What's the reasoning for "one, or three players"?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Just their artistic vision and game design philosophy, which I can both respect and go WTF at the same time. Like with their steadfast refusal to provide the option to turn off invasions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Turning off invasions while still playing coop you mean? Cause offline mode turns off invasions (duh). I guess invasions are part of the thrill in their mind and after a random coop sunbro and I were invaded by a phantom while super low health and outta potions way into a dungeon in Dark Souls and managed to survive by hiding away together with no voicecomms, it‘s hard for me to disagree with them lol

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Because From. That's the kings of nonsensical stuff like that.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

I don't know what it is with Japanese devs and arbitrary multiplayer decisions. The way Capcom handles Monster Hunter's multiplayer continues to baffle me.

From a PC gaming perspective, it feels like Western developers decided to just give players multiple options to play together all the way back in the 1990's. This sort of thing always feels badly regressive to me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

I can already hear Fromsoft fans say “it’s for lore reasons”, “it’s Miyazaki’s vision”, “git gud”, etc.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

I remember reading that bosses just scale to the amount of players so my guess is solo is actually solo. This would make the solo or trio only decision even stranger...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Game feels like a cash grab.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Nominated for GOTY next time for sure.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Summons were Dark Souls' easy mode. In Elden Ring summons activate normal mode. Not an improvement.

Running a single-player melee build shouldn't be a challenge mode.