this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
648 points (95.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

6016 readers
3230 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

It’s not offensive, it’s just not that funny.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 13 hours ago

97% of Seinfeld's entertainment value is the bass line.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

Not saying it's not funny, but there is definitely stuff in the show that wouldn't fly today. For example there is an episode where George didn't know black people ate salad.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I don't like Seinfeld, but isn't George supposed to be an utter dunce?

Like, as a Zoomer, people not being able to tell the difference between portraying bigotry and endorsing it IS an actual problem I see.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 45 minutes ago

He is and you're right.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

and a lot of questionable consent sex situations if I remember correctly

[–] MrsDoyle 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I heard on a podcast today that Larry David based the George character on himself. (The podcast is called Good Bad Billionaire, where a couple of people judge various billionaires on their ethics etc. TIL Jerry Seinfeld is a billionaire.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 minutes ago

Not a Seinfeld fan but I did see enough episodes of both it and Curb Your Enthusiasm to be annoyed that I didn't make this connection.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

That right there is some clickbait. I'm millennial and I was watching the show when it was on and loved it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, not sure how old they think millennials are or when they thought Seinfeld aired

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

#HEY IT'S THE ASSMAN!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peteypete420 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I did a re-watch in the last couple years. Most of it was fine, even if it would not be a big hit these days. Jerry dates the Asian women? Yea that would get called out most likely. Elaine dates a guy she thinks is black? Pretty sure that still flies. Elaine is scarred she's dating a murderer? Probs a special two part episode these days. Shocks me how ahead of the curve they were with the Elaine gets gaped episode.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

Oh yeah, that’s a gape

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

This whole "young people find everything offensive" narrative is ridiculous, and always has been. It's very beneficial to those who want to shift the Overton window, though.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

If they(we) think Seinfeld is offensive, what do they think of IASIP?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Meh, Jerry Seinfeld has been pushing the "I'm too offensive for young people" and "I've been cancelled" nonsense for a while now. He's just old and not funny anymore. Turns out telling the same jokes for 30 years doesn't get a lot of laughs. What is the deal with millennials anyway!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

he unequivocally walked that back recently. said he was wrong to think that and it isn't a thing. he probably had a talk with his kid or something.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

He probably had a long talk with his PR counselor and was advised that he stood to loose more then he would gain if he stuck to that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago

I don't care honestly. the message is more important than the motive.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago

Millennial here, Seinfeld is the bomb.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm an Xer and I didn't like Seinfeld, but that's mostly because I don't like embarrassment comedy. It's the same reason I don't like Will Ferrel and Ben Stiller, but to each their own. I don't begrudge anyone else finding it funny, it's just not my vibe.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 22 hours ago

I'm not saying you have to like Seinfeld or anything, but I wouldn't consider it embarrassment comedy. It's more about the gang being a bunch of sociopaths, like an early version of IASIP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

Someone should tell them to definitely stay away from Curb Your Enthusiasm (created and starring the co-creator of Seinfeld). It's like a rated-R version of Seinfeld that has absolutely no boundaries. LOL

[–] [email protected] 11 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I didn't realize people didn't like Seinfeld. It's a great show.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The show is OK. Parts of it didn't age that well (i.e. I got older and recognized there's a handful of racist narratives and depictions baked into it). But Jerry Seinfeld himself, holy cow is he a piece of shit in real life.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago

Racist narratives? Seinfeld has some episodes based on racism. The generally fall into two forms: making fun of racists and having one or more of the cast get accused of racism and hilariously try to prove they’re not.

If anything they’re making fun of the way the label of racist is impossible to get rid of once you’ve been tagged with it. It’s like being committed to a mental hospital and then trying to prove that you’re fine so they should just let you out.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago

I would be meh on it if my older brother didn't watch it every single night, rerun after rerun, when we were growing up. It got really old.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Millennial here. I tried to watch Seinfeld back in the day, and I thought it was kind of meh. But there was one character I really hated on the show. He had a whiny pathetic voice, was always complaining about something or another, and was just an awful actor, unlike the rest of the cast. I thought, if they just removed that one guy, the show would be great and I'd enjoy it so much more.

I found out later, that guy was Seinfeld. So... I never really got into the show.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Seinfeld is definitely the weakest character and the show is the most memorable from everyone else

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are we talking about "Seinfeld", the slightly overrated comedy TV series, or "Seinfeld", the horrible human being?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe an episode about an minor pursuing Elaine written by someone who's ok with dating a minor when he was 35 should be raising questions. Or when they had an episode pushing Tort reform when they made fun of the woman who was burnt by scolding hot McDonalds coffee.

Seinfield, both the character and person, is just a selfish, unsympathetic person and we're suppose to view the world though. I'm glad he's being called out for his shallow snark. This has been a long time coming.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 24 minutes ago

The whole show was people being shallow characters. That was the point.

In fairness on the coffee thing, few people have heard the whole story, even now. I think most people today still believe the story was "woman sues because coffee was hot and she got a little burned, and the jury went nuts" and don't know or care about the actual details.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Almost every time an article like this is posted, the contents are the result of one or two comments out of thousands, or a Reddit post that didn't gain much traction outside of "eh, sure, I guess?"

Tangentially related, IMO there should be an "author review" site, where if someone posts a stupid article like this, it is referenced in a database against their name and their frame of reference for the content is called out. Rank "journalists" against this, and eventually the people starting out in the industry posting AI-generated shite that doesn't hold up will start to err on the side of caution.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You've just re-invented journalistic standards and peer review.

It is how the news cycle is supposed to work. One journalist says something, others verify or disprove it publicly.

The problem is that there is now no difference between journalism and content or between news channels and platforms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 day ago

Would you leave us the fuck alone, we're old now!

[–] [email protected] 163 points 1 day ago (31 children)

Didn't millennials watch it growing up? Someone's not getting their generational terms right

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Millennials are like 40 years old now. Does this article writer think Millennial just means "kid"?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Millennials are like 40 years old now.

PS. I'm not actually 40 but I'm getting there before I even realise it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel like a lot of you assume I'm younger. I'm closer to 50 then I like to admit. I'm just not from the US, maybe that is part of why it didn't click with me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

it's the laugh track that's offensive.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

It's a live studio audience in this case. Not that it makes it any less annoying.

Edit: a word

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It's weird that "this group of people don't like that show that you like" is supposed to create some sort of negative reaction. My enjoyment of a thing does not depend on a certain number of other people liking it.

I must be numb to "outrage is the best way to engage people" that everyone uses these days.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›