this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
379 points (93.8% liked)

politics

19121 readers
3759 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Salon.com

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do we need to send in the national guard to integrate our playgrounds now? How do people see the concept of friendship as a threat to their way of life? That's your fellow American and a human being, not your enemy.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They started by slaughtering a whole race, then enslaving another.

They can’t back down now.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seems like we need explicit notes in history class for which things are being taught in order to try and prevent them from continuing or happening again. These "mama bears" obviously missed the point.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

That'd be too close to critical race theory

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago

... you, uh, new here? They never thought interracial friendships should be tolerated. And yes. They've thrown tantrums about it. (see.... the whole civil rights movement era..)

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago

Never in history have conservatives been the good guys. Why would they start now?

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is a bit of truth in that title

Right-wingers don't think

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

So what you’re saying is right wingers are hateful racists? Huh

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is not a winning strategy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It is for Republican primaries, and 222 House general elections.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Wow. That is an insane level of racism if true.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But they will still quote MLK Jr.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

While claiming the Democrats are the party of slavery while holding the Confederate flag and holding propaganda associated with being party of slavery.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They had a dream, a dream where all children are created sperate, but equal.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

My kids best friend in kindergarten was a black kid. Unfortunately they didnt end up on the same school.

Ive seen no black kids around my sons age at his current school

(We live in Denmark. Black population is only 2% or something)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So who are my mixed race kids supposed to be friends with?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From the person complaining:

When asked for an example of what was concerning parents, Dungan replied: “A poster that shows ‘All Belong Here’ with racially colored hands. This was an example that was first brought to me early this year.”

She continued: “I think the intention of the poster was good and the parent thought that the intention of the poster was good. However, the unintended consequences of that poster made the first grader feel like ‘why wouldn’t I be accepted here?’ It had a reverse effect on the first grader because it was in the classroom.”

Source

Not a good argument at all- but she clearly didn't say kids of different races couldn't be friends.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

That's a very surface level reading.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So the child was uncomfortable because they don't believe people of different color should hold hands?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Pre Antebellum Republicans strike again

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

well that's just not smart.

load more comments
view more: next ›