this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
843 points (98.6% liked)

Memes @ Reddthat

1034 readers
2 users here now

The Memes community. Where Memes matter the most.

We abide by Reddthat's Instance Rules & the Lemmy Code of Conduct. By interacting here you agree to these terms.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mandy 1 points 3 days ago

i just want a helms deep srt that doesnt require selling my kidneys man

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Even when I have extra income, I just cannot bring myself to spend several hundred dollars on Lego. They had this Batman shadowbox set that was fucking DOPE and yeah, I could have saved up to buy it, but if I did I know it wouldn't make me happy knowing how much I'd spent on it, I'd just always think omg, I dropped hundreds of dollars on this, am I an idiot?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Something that I came up with during the pandemic was to buy, build, and then resell full kits in basically new condition on a site called Bricklink. It's like eBay for LEGO only, with an insane number of filtering options and seller base (FFS I found kits for sale I played with as a kid lol).

Doesn't quite work out to "free" and it's a bit of a hassle, but it solves that problem for me of wanting to enjoy a big involved build, but being a (boringly) sane adult who can't justify spending hundreds of dollars on tiny plastic (magnificently designed, engineered, and mfg'ed) bricks.

Edit: Check it out lol

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

That is pretty fucking sick

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

This is awesome! Thanks for the link!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are also few sites that let you rent the different sets. My brother's used NetBricks and it sounded like it could be another option if the buying/selling thing makes it too much.

From what he told me is you pick a set/s online, the kit comes in the mail, build and enjoy it for a bit, then you would tear it down completely when you are bored of it, stuff all of it in a special zip lock bag and send it back for your next set. He told me they go over all the returned pieces to look for damaged/missing parts, "sanitize" (probably just wash them) them, and repackage them for the next renter.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When you resell, do you generally do a profit on it ?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, no, there's a ton of sellers. If you want it to actually sell, you take a bit of a loss. Think of it like an annoyingly involved rental program.

I think some kits can get more expensive than retail due to rarity or something, but I wasn't looking at any of that, just wanted an affordable way to build some cool kits.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Understood. But it's a cool idea, I've always preferred building the model than play with it 🙂

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

For some people I could see it as a fun thing/whatever. I always see the end result being: now where do I put this... These things are huge (comparatively) and I would have to empty out a whole shelf somewhere just to house it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago (7 children)

To be fair to Lego, which I agree is crazy expensive, they have tighter tolerances in flaws than NASA does. I work in manufacturing, through a different type, and tolerances that tight mean a huge amount of your production becomes scrap.

You could discuss the whether perfectionism is worth the waste, and that's a valid point, but Lego is at least delivering a solid product

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What a rediculous, and untrue, comparison to make. NASA (1) isn't a consumer manufacturing company, (2) makes an absolutely insane variety of types science experiments from space telescopes to supersonic planes, (3) absolutely makes/uses parts with orders of magnitude tighter tolerances than Lego holds.

[–] devils_advocate 7 points 1 week ago

This. Lego has amazing tolerance for a toy, but isn't leading across the whole of the injection molding industry.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They make plastic though. Surely they recycle the scrap

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lego bricks are made using virgin plastic, which I assume means all scrap is not recycled and used to make more Lego.

Some parts, like flexible parts and transparent parts are made using more sustainable materials, whether that consists of some recycled material or plant derived plastics.

[–] BigDanishGuy 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

When trying to find differences between virgin and recycled scap plastic all I get is AI crap product comparison sites and various companies trying to sell their recycling system...

What downsides is there to recycling your own plastic scrap, which you have had full control over the entire time. I would imagine trying to color match with consumer waste plastic is a nightmare, same with moisture (at least that's an issue when printing). But if you have a bunch of plastic in an homogeneous color and you grind it up to make something of the same color, and you've had the scraps in a controlled environment, then what more issues are there?

[–] Aux 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The plastic will be grounded up and re-used, that's 100%, but it still requires quite a bit of virgin pellets to be mixed in. Here's why:

  1. Used plastic is dirty. Even if it just came off the belt as a brand new part, it already has dust, oil and other residue. Just a little bit, but it's not as good as a virgin material.
  2. You cannot grind down parts into perfect pellets, and that will cause feed rate variations.
  3. Additives inside like dyes degrade when heated. Multiple extrusions will change product appearance.
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Still takes time to run the recycling systems and therefor money.

Also, think of it this way - you spend $X per 1000 bricks, but you can only sell 10% of those bricks. The remaining bricks get melted down at a cost of $Y. You then spend $9X/10 to produce another 900 bricks, of which only 90 are sellable. Rinse and repeat until all bricks are viable. You'll have spent a hell of a lot of money producing the later batches.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lego's competition has been improving their quality in the last few years, to a point where I'd argue some are on par or better (Cobi, Mould King, Xingbao).

At the same time Lego has started to produce in China like almost any other competitor and their quality has lapsed somewhat. Especially color accuracy has allegedly been shite, even in some VERY expensive sets.

Lego just isn't worth an almost 100% premium, imo. If you're in Europe check out Bluebrixx and Cobi. One makes licensed Star Trek sets, the other licensed cars like Škoda, Opel, Fiat, and others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Once I worked out that Lego work to the same tolerances as the transistors in a Pentium II CPU. It's probably a better example than NASA as NASA makes huge things that don't require submillimetre tolerances and tiny precise instruments that couldn't have been made a couple of decades ago.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Except there are competitors by now with equally good tolerances and overall part quality that still cost half as much, so that can't really be the reason

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess I've been out of it too long - I've always found knockoff brands just don't have the same precision and quality.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

To be fair, it's still hit or miss, you need to do a little research to know what you're getting, but it has gotten sooo much better in the last couple of years. At this point, any brand that uses pieces made by gobricks is going to give you excellent piece quality rivaling or even surpassing that of Lego in some aspects. My recommendations if you want to check it out are Pantasy and Funwhole, both make great original sets with high quality prints, the latter even with fully integrated light kits. Those are not the only options, but the best ones at the moment in my opinion

Edit to add: as said a lot has happened just in the last few years, so to get a good picture of the current quality landscape, even with the brands I mentioned it's a good idea to stick to their newer sets for now, since you might still get earlier generations of bricks that are not quite as good with the older models that have been sitting on shelves for some time

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Media licensing has been the greatest boost to profits for Lego while simultaneously causing a shift away from creative/imaginative building. Meaning, more people (adults) than ever are buying lego sets but they build what’s on the box and then it sits on a shelf forever, instead of modifying the initial build or taking it apart and making something new.

I’m not trying to criticize anyone’s hobby, and I too have purchased an expensive licensed lego set, built it, and let it collect dust on my shelf. It’s such an expensive way to get or build a model of something though. I much prefer making my own creations. And i could take apart this cool, big, expensive batmobile, but I don’t because it reminds me of a movie i like. Contrast this with my lego space sets, which i took apart almost immediately after building in order to build an even cooler, bigger space station with.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My kids do the same - they ask for Lego Minecraft sets or Lego Ninjago sets or whatever, build them and stick them on the shelf. They're horrified by my suggestion that they tear them down and build other random things with the bits. And, of course, a lot of the bits nowadays are so specialized that they have limited uses. When I was a kid most of my lego was just standard blocks.

[–] zalgotext 10 points 1 week ago

I was a K'Nex kid more than a LEGO kid, but I remember both my K'Nex and LEGO sets coming with manuals that had directions for making dozens of things, all from the same set. That shit was awesome, and was a really good way to teach you the creativity and skills to go off script and make your own creations. Buying a LEGO set intended to make one specific thing seems counter to the original purpose of the toy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Agreed, but what I've heard through is that Lego's finances were really struggling till taking the franchising deals. Given how good the quality of Lego always seems to be compared to cheaper brands, whilst I'd like old-style creative building (and cheaper!) Lego, I feel an unusual sympathy for them getting a bunch of money from these deals.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

You see what you want to see?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was buying one set a year to do when the rains come here in mid-fall. And then $400 sets starting showing up. Now I no longer buy LEGO.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I honestly don't get what companies are thinking with these prices. They're all raising prices, despite reporting record breaking profits, and for me the experience has been the same as yours, I just buy less or stop buying completely.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How long until we can torrent a set and print it in 3D?

[–] BlueMagma 6 points 1 week ago

You already can, the shape of the Lego brick fell into public domain, you can find legal knock off of their design (on AliExpress for example). The problem is that plastic and electricity cost so much you don't save a lot compared to an industrialised environment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

You wouldn’t download a brick.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe I dont get the joke, but Duplo is part of Lego..

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago
load more comments
view more: next ›