this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
184 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39385 readers
2267 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump’s advisers are proposing plans to end the Ukraine war that involve territorial concessions to Russia and ruling out NATO membership for Ukraine.

These proposals aim to pressure both sides into negotiations, leveraging military aid as a carrot or stick. Plans include freezing current battle lines or creating demilitarized zones.

Analysts doubt the feasibility, citing likely resistance from Ukraine, European allies, and U.S. lawmakers.

Trump’s approach reflects his campaign pledge to resolve the conflict quickly, but critics argue it risks legitimizing Russian aggression and undermining Western alliances.

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 121 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

President Zelenskyy could have ended the war many months ago if he’d just agreed to all of Putin’s demands. Who knew?

[–] [email protected] 44 points 3 weeks ago

But then Russia would just be forced to invade some more later because they simply can't help themselves. So Zelensky should do the right thing and hand over all of Ukraine so that Russia doesn't have to go through so much trouble again. All the Baltics and EU should do the same so poor old Putin can finally take a nice vacation.

[–] [email protected] 113 points 3 weeks ago

So essentially his plan to "end the war" is to force Ukraine into submitting to all of Russia's demands?

He couldn't be much more overtly in bed with Russia if he tried... Might as well just wait for the photos to leak of him in a rather grotesque threesome with Elon and Putin at this point.

[–] Aurenkin 73 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Wow, what a fucking horrible idea. Not only will this fail to end the conflict quickly but it all but guarantees another one. Let's hope Ukraine's other allies are up to the task if Trump actually tries to follow through with this dogshit plan.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

For Ukraine, only NATO membership makes sense to end the war.

There is literally nothing else that can prevent Russia from invading. They broke their word in 2014, then again in 2022, without NATO membership, Ukraine will just get invaded again and again by Russia until it’s a satellite state or fully annexed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I think Europe and Ukraine would be happy with EU membership, or, failing that (because overall complicated and it's gonna take some time) a way to extend Article 42(7) guarantees to Ukraine. Invite the UK etc. while you're at it.

Who should be shit-scared of that possibility is the US because it'd sideline them. Worse: It's bound to come with "buy European" provisions (the French will insist and nobody's going to bother opposing it harshly) and I'm not sure whether the US can afford its military-industrial complex without exports.

So... did Trump already meet with Lockheed-Martin?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I.e. "peace" as demanded by Trumps handler Putin.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If he was fully on the leash then I would have expected surrender of the whole Donbas under threat of pulling aid

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

Give it a few months.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago

If he's claiming he'll drop the US out of NATO, why does he think his (concept of a) plan, for the alliance that he hates, has any weight at all? Fucking dipshit.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah at this point i think NATO doesn't give a fuck about the US of A anymore. Maybe when somebody that is normal becomes president again. Really fuck Trump, little bootlicking orange.

[–] AwesomeLowlander 13 points 3 weeks ago

Even then. NATO cannot rely on a country that potentially flip flops every 4 years.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Problem is that the only way NATO gets new members is through unanimous vote. That is how Turkey managed to delay Sweden's entry into NATO over some petty nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Who cares what the orange felon wants? Not his country to make decisions on.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

You say that, but without the US military support it will be rough for Ukraine. The EU has spent a bunch of money to get all other kinds of aid to Ukraine, much more than the US. But the US has supplied more military support, more than the EU. If the US stops helping out, the EU will probably not be able to fill the gap. And Trump can put pressure on the EU by threatening to pull out of Nato again. If Russia decides to invade more countries and the US leaves Nato hanging, the EU is in trouble. Now these are a lot of ifs and since Trump has been elected the EU has been preparing. Plus laws have been passed in the US to prevent Trump from pulling out of Nato, but you know how much Trump cares about laws. Once the EU feels like they don't need the support from the US any more, Trump has nothing to say anymore, but we ain't there yet.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

But the US has supplied more military support, more than the EU.

The US has supplied a lot of aid, and aid that cannot be obtained from elsewhere, but in terms of volume, the EU has gradually passed it by.

Sadly, it seems unlikely that the EU can ramp up weapons industries much faster. Ukrainians themselves have stated that without US assistance, they would run a serious risk of losing the war.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, basically the US can decide who gets how much of an advantage in this war by simply dialing up or down their military aid.

Ukraine not willing to negotiate? Dial it down. Russia not willing? Dial it up.

So they can end this war if they are willing to invest accordingly. But not this conflict. Will that lead to a stable peace, or just another war in the near future? Without satisfying answers to these questions, Ukraine is probably better off to keep fighting, even without any US aid, which repeals the first sentence of this paragraph.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago

legitimizing Russian aggression and undermining Western alliances

Yup, sounds like Trump; that russian asset.

So Ukraine needs to get nukes to deter a 3rd invasion in a few years? Just great.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago
[–] gravitas_deficiency 11 points 3 weeks ago

I’m gonna bet that Zelenskyy’s response is gonna be “nah”

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Trump: if Ukraine refuses my plan, I turn off the tap of $/weapons to you! if Russia refuses my plan I send tons of shitload of weapons to Ukraine!

EDIT: it is written in the article

halting military aid to Kyiv unless it agrees to talk but boosting assistance if Russian President Vladimir Putin refuses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't get why you are being downvoted. That is exactly what his position is, which would be clear to anyone who actually read the article.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know too, it is the exact plan of Trump, either stop delivering weapons to Ukraine, or increase delivery

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Why would Russia ever refuse this, it's victory??

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Because Putin wants more, and he certainly does not want Trump to dictate him something! Trump is the puppet and Putin the puppet master.