this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
217 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19156 readers
2610 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 20 hours ago (7 children)

Just in case any future presidents need a precedent for this kinda stuff.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 18 hours ago

Yea like Ford's pardon of Nixon, you mean those precedents?

[–] Mouselemming 7 points 16 hours ago

Maybe Biden should make Hunter ambassador to France for the rest of the year

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

All the other cases where they sentenced someone with a federal gun charge for lying on the form were plea deals. ABC said they couldn't find any instances of someone being charged and convicted on that charge alone. You can't say this wasn't a politically motivated prosecution when the charge has never been used that way before.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

Dem voters for about 20 years:

We need regulations!

Moderates:

No, just enforce what we have! Stop asking for what we need!

Also moderatess:

Are you nuts?! We can't enforce the rules when our side break them!!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

As liberals brush it off as if there isn't a 2 tiered justice system in the US.

[–] traches 0 points 8 hours ago

Liberal here, there is definitely a 2 tiered justice system in the US what are you even talking about

Our disagreement is over the idea that somehow the billionaire with an army of lawyers, who appointed half the judges his cases are in front of, and has been given every conceivable affordance and courtesy, is anywhere other than the top of the privileged tier.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 20 hours ago (11 children)

Democrats aren’t exactly being a role model right now, but a lot of them are probably covering the asses of their own since Republicans are so blind by fascistic rage that they’re going to put a lot of innocent heads on pikes.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

This thread reads like a satire of how Democrats are happy to sink lower and lower while using the GOP as an excuse.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Too bad they don't sink lower when prosecuting trump for insurrection.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago

Yeah. I’m willing to say when I see my far-preferred party doing something I consider unethical, but I also recognize their game theory and why the current circumstances would lead them to make myopic decisions in the interest of short-term survival and at the cost of long-term reputation and public perception.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (2 children)

So his lame duck period is even more full-throated support for Israel and pardoning his own failson. He could, like, do anything at all that helps people. Any sort of progressive, popular idea that would actually benefit Americans. Hell, even if he failed it would do wonders for his legacy. He could try to do something, anything, to start making up for dragging down the entire party by refusing to drop out earlier, or allow for an actual primary. But nah. Pardons for Hunter.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 19 hours ago

He could, like, do anything at all that helps people.

You'd think the minimum would be "not leave federal judicial picks open" with him having a D senate this whole time...

https://www.uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/judicial-vacancies/current-judicial-vacancies

Sitting at 42 trump will get to seat if they don't get their shit together. Bidens only nominated 12, so it's almost impossible all 42 gets seated.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 19 hours ago

If he or the other ghouls wanted to do anything that benefits working people they would have done it when they could get votes for it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (4 children)

Its not the first time dems look indistinguishable from republicans (who are fascists) on Joe's watch, is it.

Biden is a guy who participated in obvious war crimes that 88% of his party didnt support-- as a democrat.. And imperiously ignored the key issues of the campaign. Of course he's going to pardon his shitty d-bag lobbyist son on the way out the door. Biden has lowered the bar for his party, for democracy, and for the entire western world order straight through the floor and deep into bedrock. We'll need some sort of engineering miracle to ever even raise the bar up to ground level, much less hold it any higher anytime soon.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

But Biden said he was the justice guy and he would not intervene!

All the excuses to pardon Hunter out of "fear of Trump" could be used to excuse things that actually helped the public

[–] [email protected] 5 points 19 hours ago

Well that's a robust fuck you to republicans.

[–] iAmTheTot 5 points 20 hours ago

Yikes. This is not going to go over well.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›