this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
106 points (90.8% liked)

Programming

17547 readers
52 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 75 points 5 days ago (3 children)

According to their FAQ, they say it's supposed to be pronounced /forˈd͡ʒe.jo/ and provide an audio clip: https://forgejo.org/static/forgejo.mp4

To me that sounds like "for-jay-oh".

[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 days ago

damn, soft g + not a silent e + German j.

I would've pronounced it forge + Joe before this. would have only gotten a third of those things right.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I thought it was a play on "forge", I was wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

It's the Esperanto word for "forge", according to the FAQ.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

For-jail-o?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

On the official page it says that it is pronounced For Jay Yo (at least close enough)

[–] [email protected] 35 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

Forge, yo Mr. White!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

For gay hoe

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

I hope that someday they decide to add the diacritic to clear up the confusion (Forĝejo (/forˈd͡ʒe.jo/) is how it's supposed to be pronounced). It's 2024, there's no reason we should be afraid of non-ASCII characters.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago (3 children)

How does one actually read these? Wouldn't phonetic spelling be infinitely more digestible?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I don't see a reason to spell it phonetically when it is a real word (forge in esperanto). A phonetic spelling would also only be more digestible to readers who know the language the phonetic spelling is tailored at (phonetic spelling is language specific as different languages use different ways to represent different sounds).

ĝ is simply the english sound of the consonants in the following words: "john", "gem", "jar". And j is pronounced as the y in "yes" and "yoink"

The diacritic would clear up confusion, because "g" without the diacritic has different sound (like the g in "gamma", "girl", "go" in english). The diacritic as a bonus would also makes it clear that it isn't supposed to be pronounced it as if it were in english, because english does not use the ^ diacritic. It would also extinguish my annoyance at seeing a misspelled word being used as a trademark.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

A phonetic spelling would also only be more digestible to readers who know the language the phonetic spelling is tailored at

Indeed, it would be digestible to 1.5 billion people instead of 100k.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA/English

This is phonetic^1^ spelling. The only good one.

^1^ Actually phonemic. Don’t kill me

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Is anyone able to read IPA without that key? This is where I get lost. It's an entire new language for a very specific thing so I can't imagine anyone but language scholars finding it useful

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

yeah I can read without the key, it's not that hard, and it's not a new language, it's just a script that unambiguously maps phonemes to "letters".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The ones used for English? Sure. When it comes to other languages I certainly don’t know all of them though.

Though, that is at least partially due to me learning English as a second language so I’ve looked at these a lot in dictionaries.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

There's no universal "phonetic spelling."

Every language and its user have unique accent and they will intreprete phonitic spelling differently.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 days ago

There is one, it's called the IPA or International Phonetic Alphabet and is used mostly by linguist. The IPA spelling changes based on dialects within the same language and if you know all the letters and are able to pronounce them you could in theory read a text written in IPA and the listener could understand it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s 2024, there’s no reason we should be afraid of non-ASCII characters.

I use an American layout and don't have a numpad :(

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

On screen keyboards exist for you monsters who think ditching the numpad is acceptable behaviour

[–] Aurenkin 21 points 5 days ago

Don't try and start these pronunciation debates online. It might seem fun but sooner or later the chickens will come home to Rust.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Forge her? I barely know her!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

i think this is the first comment i've read since joining the fediverse to make me actually laugh. thank you for posting something far funnier than it had any right to be.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Fuhgeddaboutit.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I pronounce it as in Esperanto, I speak it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Jes tio estis ankaŭ mia unua intuicio sed mi ne certas ĉu ĝi fakte estu Esperanto aŭ la -ejo estas nura koincido?

Redakto: laŭ https://forgejo.org/faq/ jes sed la intencita elparolo estas tamen "forĝejo"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Awesome phonetic illustration. You should do a dictionary.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 days ago

I pronounce it Forgejo.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

It rhymes with orange.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

I imagine 'Forge' like you pronounce, well, forge, and 'jo' like you pronounce Joe*.

*Language and accent differences may apply, but hey, that's the beauty of the world's diversity!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

I know it's officially for-hey-oe, but I always say forge + joe cause I find it easier. I used to say "forjo" (like "forge" ending in an "o", or "for joe" sped up) as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Fourier eaux

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

For-jeh-joe. Forge-joe?

I think I mispronounce it, "Forgeio," to be honest.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Surprisingly, I mispronounce it exactly like that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

4G-O, like a Star Wars droid

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I pronounce it "that gogs fork with a dumb name".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That gogs' fork's fork with a dumb name.

Forgejo is a gitea fork

But yeah, name shenanigans aside, it's pretty solid. I like it a lot

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That "dumb" name is just name in another language 🫠

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I just do the Swedish accent thing and pronounce it forge-yo (like in yo-yo, not the greeting proclamation)

load more comments
view more: next ›