This is bullshit, it defined but didn't even use the continuous functions πand π.
this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
197 points (94.6% liked)
196
16591 readers
1964 users here now
Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.
Rule: You must post before you leave.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
golang is gonna be fuckin pissed when it finds out
IMSA kid?
Those are backups in case the other functions break down.
Yes I can, as this is just the metric induces by the L-infinty norm. But why did we introduce π andπ?
π isnt a metric dumbass, its an orange
Americans will use anything other than metric
But what if it was grown in Europe?
Naranja
So to clarify, definitely European and not African?
I don't know falls to his death
I mean, technically, it is true. At least 25% of people can't solve that.
Its probably reasonable to say that 25% of math majors cant solve this, therefore non-math majors aren't people
"sup" without a "\" belongs-to-set symbol \[ and \]
scrΓΆdinger's TeX
I can answer the question. No.
Heβs right.
Look at this shmuck, using the supremum of a continuous function on a closed interval when it clearly achieves a maximum. I bet theyβll feel real embarrassed about that one when theyβre falling asleep years from now.
Christ, it's like people just don't even give a fuck about the extreme value theorem anymore?
I get you are joking, but I've seen many literature just using sup for maximum. Maybe for consistency or laziness, idk why
ππππ
By using π to rate how good this post is(out of 5), i made it a metric for how good this post is
I am waiting for someone to actually answer this
Thanks. I've mostly forgotten real analysis by this point but the meme seemed really familiar, lol.
Thanks for the link. I expected there would be a problem with triangle inequality but didn't want to do the actual proving π
Oh, I expected it to be some unsolved problem.
Nyar!
The function is a homeomorphism on R, so it preserves its topological features.