Harry Potter

887 readers

35 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

-5

HBO Says ‘Harry Potter’ Series Will ‘Benefit’ From J.K. Rowling’s Involvement: She ‘Has the Right to Express Her Personal Views’ (variety.com)

submitted 14 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

HBO defended J.K. Rowling's involvement in its upcoming "Harry Potter" TV series, emphasizing her creative contributions and her right to express personal views despite controversy over her anti-trans statements.

Rowling's outspoken gender-related beliefs have deeply divided the Harry Potter fanbase, with some advocating for boycotts and others finding ways to reconcile their love for the franchise while opposing her views.

Despite fan backlash and fractured enthusiasm, the "Wizarding World" franchise remains commercially strong, and Rowling appears unfazed by criticism, continuing to focus on her advocacy and involvement in the new series.

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] southsamurai 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Well, yeah, she has a right to free expression.

We have the right to ostracise her and anyone exposing the kind of bigotry she expresses. That's up to and including HBO or it's affiliates

But, separate from that, her involvement is a disappointment on quality level. As much as I love the books and goddess movies, the woman is a mid tier writer. Which is still better than most people, but if she's influencing production decisions along her established works, then the new stuff will be just as flawed as the old because she's run out of new ideas and is coasting. She's neither necessary nor useful to a series based on an established set of books

[–] threelonmusketeers 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

She's neither necessary nor useful to a series based on an established set of books

Do you think it would be possible to make the series faithful to the books (or at least more than the films were) without her involvement?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Yes.

How is it that hard? I'm assuming the producers, directors, script-writers and so on can read. The books are not that long (even Phoenix is not that long in the grand scheme of things).

The only reason to get her involved is to provide "extra" background detail that doesn't appear in the books at which point they have stopped being faithful to the books and are just made up bollocks.

So either you have a series that is faithful to the books, or faithful to her original vision which will be nothing like the books we all know and (I would assume) love, or we get a series that is something like the films which I happen to think were great and -- in places -- a vast improvement on the books.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Well that's entirely put me off.

Not because of her bigoted rants. I would imagine that isn't going to show up in the show all that much -- I can't imagine how she can work it in without making it overly obvious.

No -- my problem is that Secrets of Dumbledore was crap. I mean REALLY bad. So if she brings her "special touch" to the series the way she did with that then god its going to be appalling.

[–] threelonmusketeers 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Was she the reason Fantastic Beasts failed, though? (Genuine question, as I haven't seen the films yet)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago

I have no idea.

But she wrote all three screen plays, and for me they were just ill conceived as a way to tell the Dumbledore/Grindelwald story. And the last one was particularly bad as a film -- the story, the production..... everything.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 10 hours ago

She’s got a right to fuck right off and to stfu.

Fans going to continue the status quo by enabling hate, as usual.