this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
79 points (97.6% liked)

Europe

1536 readers
814 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

Ukraine has signed the Ottawa treaty that prohibits the use of mines. What consequences will that have on Ukraine and on the compliance of this kind of treaties by other signing countries?

(Of course Russia and the US, being the large piles of shit they are regarding weapons industry, haven't signed the treaty).

[–] Quacksalber 18 points 1 day ago

Russia has shown that it breaks treaties whenever it sees fit. If Ukraine is to supposed to respect treaties, it needs to be supported to such an extend that it sees no need to break them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

For example, US allies Ukraine and Finland have recently signaled they might withdraw from the treaty out of military necessity.

src (2014)

They say it's a matter of necessity. And it seems withdrawal from the treaty is an option.

/edit: Another source from Wikipedia:

Russian forces have widely utilized antipersonnel mines since their full invasion of Ukraine commenced on February 24, 2022.

The Monitor also reports the use of antipersonnel mines by Ukrainian government forces in and around the city of Izium in 2022 when the city was under Russian control. Ukraine is bound by the Mine Ban Treaty.

They've already been using them.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Why is it that some people frequently say something that Ukraine has 'signed treaties', or 'the West must not cross red lines' ...

All this without naming the aggressor in this war which is Russia. Russia permanently violates airspace of Poland, Romania, Moldova. Russia deploys sabotage activities in multiple countries across Europe, in the North Sea, the Baltic Sea, espionage activities in the Irish Sea. Russia gets decisive support by China in its war in Ukraine. North Korea is sending troops. Iran has been sending drones.

What consequences should that have on the compliance of treaties by countries, @[email protected]?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

So because Russia doesn't play by the rules, no one else should?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Yeah, that was my thought too...

If they want to defend their country, even in victory... years of farmers and their families getting maimed and killed.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Proper mines destroy themselves after a fixed period of time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

perhaps.. someone said a 'battery' runs out...

I'm assuming they are loaded with high-order explosive, so a random foot or cultivating machine 'shouldn't' set it off..

Still I'd be hesitant,

even their own troops could walk into it by accident,

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I only know of the AT2 anti vehicle mines from Bundeswehr. They disarm after an adjustable period of time, between 3 and 96 hours, by self detonation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Sadly the better option than genocide.

[–] pastermil 2 points 20 hours ago

Well, if they don't get that victory, they won't have to worry about those farmers...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Dumb :| Give them more missiles instead.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

hey if they’re sitting there, give em

[–] [email protected] -1 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Ukraine has signed the Ottawa Treaty, banning the use of anti-personel landmines though. It's imperative that they stick to it. Also it brings so much issues when the war is over, just look at Cambodia

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

I'm not arguing for the use of land mines here (too destructive to civilians), but what's your argument for the following?

It's imperative that they stick to it [the treaty]

Sincere question, why? They're being invaded by an enemy that does not accept surrender / treat POWs properly (or even as humans), and which frequently commits atrocities on civilian populations in occupied areas. Even if you accept that some conduct is unacceptable even in defense of one's home, what about when you know the invaders are going to rape, torture, and kill women and children?

Why do they need to follow "the rules"? Or ANY rules? What's worse than what is being inflicted on their innocent people?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

It’s imperative that they stick to it.

Why?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Letting Russia win introduces continuous genocide and forced conscription for war against EU states issue. Pick your poison.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Abstaining from using illegal weapons is not decisive for the outcome of the war. Ukraine should receive more legal weapons and have no constraints on using them. That is the poison to pick.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago

Problem is, the first half of your statement is dependent on the latter half. That’s not a choice for Ukraine, but a fallback strategy.

[–] pastermil 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

ITT: couch experts worrying about conventions and ethics while the people in question are literally fighting for their lives

[–] [email protected] 6 points 14 hours ago

Landmines kill innocent people decades after the conflicts they were deployed in are over. So yeah, it's fighting for their lives, too

[–] [email protected] -3 points 14 hours ago

Jesus, what were they giving them before? Sticks and stones?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Just to remind you: Landmines are considered a war crime and should never be used. That is because they mostly do damage in the long-term, similar to nuclear fallout.

[–] Tar_alcaran 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Landmines are considered a war crime and should never be used.

They're not though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

Maybe my memory is inaccurate

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago

War of aggression is a war crime, as are many things. Who’s going to uphold the law though?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Great, more war crimes and decades of demining after the war...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

These mines are battery-powered, and when it runs out, the mine cannot trigger. So demining is easier at least...