this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
56 points (88.9% liked)

World News

32341 readers
503 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Spokesperson, issue more empty threats! Surely this time they will finally take me seriously!”

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Almost 25 years of that attitude from the US is how this war started in the first place[1], and now hundreds of thousands are dead or injured and millions are displaced.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

You will find that the actual cause for the dead, injured, and displaced, is that Russia invaded Ukraine.

The simplest fix would be for the Russians to go home.

The more permanent fix would be for the Russians to go home, and have Vladimir Putin accidentally fall out of a window very high up. That would be reasonable, given how many men he basically threw into a meat grinder.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

The war started because of Russia. It's insane to state otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Every recrimination has an equal and opposite recrimination. In the end, we are where we are and every country chooses how to play their own hand by themselves.

Russian leadership knew what they were doing when they attacked a foreign sovereign country in an act overt aggression.

I’m sure there are plenty of rationalizations they tell themselves, but it’s not the US that “started this” in any meaningful way.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Completely unrelated question: how hard does one have to rattle a sabre before it snaps the blade?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

So I commented this before, Russia spends the same amount on its nuclear arsenal as the UK, while claiming a far larger arsenal. Even accounting for differences in currency value (so cheaper labour) and assuming Russia has some magical efficiency gains in maintenance its still not enough to even come close to maintaining an arsenal that size. Nukes need the fissile material swapped out every couple of decades or they're just really expensive dirty bombs.

This puts Russia in the position where if they launch a single nuke as a warning there's a genuine chance that it might just fizzle, if that happens it would be crippling to their apperance as a nuclear armed state on the world stage, the embarassment of crossing the ultimate red line with nothing to show for it.

So i guess the answer is the sabre is pretty rusty and it might not snap when rattled but there is a chance it snaps when Putin goes in for a real stab.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wish they invented a nuclear weapon that only worked on the dumb mfs who think playing chicken with nuclear weapons is so cool.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I highly doubt Russia has any functioning nukes anyway. Even if they did, there's no way they'd use them. You keep your fearmongering elsewhere

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

The country with the highest stockpile of nuclear weapons, with battle tested capabilities and the most advanced ICBMs in existence, you doubt they have nukes?

There's drinking the Kool aid and there's this. I'm legitimately amazed that some of you Americans can mouthbreathe and walk at the same time, and more amazed that half the voting population is even dumber than that.

If this stupid provocation only ended up with America in ashes you'd more than have it coming, but unfortunately we share a world and I'd like to keep living in it, not that y'all made it any better due to your absolute nonchalance about climate change.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Hey I have a question, what does Putin's ass taste like?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In a parallel universe, I would like to witness an official sarcastic response.

'U.S. eager to witness Russia's awesome destructive power in person after Oppenhiemer success. Government announces free UV glasses for safe viewing. Populace hopeful for a swift end to capitalism after nuclear winter'

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

~~China's~~ Russia's Final Warning

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

If all you had were regular warheads I'd be cheering on Americans playing chicken to their fucking grave but nuclear war would kill me too, get the fuck outta here with that.

At this point, death to America isn't a radical slogan, it's in self defense.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Welp there goes my fucking sleep for tonight. I wish Washington and Langley alone would somehow disappear off the face of the earth and solve half the problems in the world overnight.

Why the fuck does the rest of the world have to risk a nuclear extinction (and a climate one, honestly) just because the US are too fucking stupid and greedy to let go of a single cent in the world.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This instance is hilarious.

Russia makes threats with nukes, because a country they attacked dares to defend itself

lemmy.ml: Why would the US do this?

The notion that Russia doesn't need to invade or make nuclear threats is completely unthinkable around these parts.

If you just analyze the 1000 most recent posts on the local worldnews, it's pretty openly a propaganda channel.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fuck off, Americans might not have a working memory longer than the last headline, but I remember the US proudly supporting the maidan coup with congresspeople on the ground, and I remember the US sending billions in weapons, blocking peace talks that a majority of Ukrainians want (because it wOulD bE a cOnCesSiOn) and Biden authorizing the use of NATO weaponry and guidance systems, any of which could reasonably carry a nuclear warhead. Let's not foeget the US is the only country to ever use them on people.

I've been told for a year that the traditional military operation Russia willingly engaged in was a colossal failure and Russia was bound to fall down at the slightest wind, on other threads you stupid gringos are going"lol he won't do it let's keep poking" and then you come on other threads to pretend history starts at the reply and not the provocation.

The rest of the world no longer buys the concern trolling from clueless (or outright malicious) gringos.

The US has done what it's done for over a century, sabotage, start proxy wars and undermine democracy and when a country replies dumbass fucking libs will start crying about how that country is just being super aggressive for, like, just no reason 😢.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

Why do you give Russia a free pass here? They are the ones threatening to use nuclear weapons. But somehow Washington is the bad guys. What a fucked up take.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Honestly I just find it laughable. 1, because there are more nuclear red lines behinds us than I care to count. And 2, if the last Russian missile test is anything to go by, I'm more worried about a giant chain reaction blowing up all of Russia.