this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
469 points (98.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4528 readers
1088 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Few people talk about Marx' younger sister, Anya, who was a near world class sprinter in a time when women were discouraged from such things.

She became so famous back then for her abilities that they still say her full name at the beginning of most every competitive footrace in the world.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I…. Hate you….

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Bourgeois is the characteristic of the middle class.

Bourgeoisie is the middle class itself.

The Aristocracy is the class that controls most governments.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

that's not the Marxist definition most leftists use

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

During the time of Marx, the bourgeoisie was keeping the proletariat down. They directly owned the means of production, since Soviet Russia did not have a stock market.

Now in the US, the bourgeoisie has become smaller and less influential. They no longer own the means of production due to selling shares.

Our oppressors are the aristocrats. They sit on the boards with majority power, giving direction without directly running the businesses.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

More like plutocrats. Aristocrats would be the nobel left after the fall of monarchies. Plutocrats are the rich corporate elite.

Or just go with the umbrella term: Oligarchs.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fair. We still agree that our enemy is not the bourgeoisie. They’re becoming more of the proletariat every year.

https://www.pewresearch.org/race-and-ethnicity/2024/05/31/the-state-of-the-american-middle-class/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What?! The bourgeoisie is the owning class of the means of production. They exploit labour and are the primary enemy of the working classes of this world

EDIT: aristocrats are a feature of feudalism and it's remnants

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Right. And what class is running Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street and the like that sit on the board with majority ownership of every bourgeoisie run business in the US? The wealthiest people in the nation.

The bourgeoisie is being leveraged against the proletariat by the aristocrats/plutocrats through stock ownership. The bourgeoisie no longer own or control their own businesses in the US.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You're using class terminology in a way that doesn't conform to any leftist current and this deliberately confuses the conversation. Furthermore, the bourgeoisie are the class that owns Blackrock, Vanguard, etc. You are using Petite Bourgeoisie to refer to Bourgeoisie.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So the wealthiest people in the nation are the bourgeoisie according to Marx? Do you have a source?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Even in Marx's time, there was stock speculation, he even won money on the stock market on occasion. The Bourgeoisie are owners of Capital, this includes large financial and stock Capital as well. The subsection of the bourgeoisie that faces proletarianization is the Petite Bourgeoisie.

You'd do well to read Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You didn’t answer my question, and now I have another.

How did he invest in stocks if there wasn’t a Soviet stock system? Russia created the RTS (Russian Trading System) in 1995.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"I have, which will surprise you not a little, been speculating — partly in American funds, but more especially in English stocks, which are springing up like mushrooms this year (in furtherance of every imaginable and unimaginable joint stock enterprise), are forced up to quite an unreasonable level and then, for the most part, collapse. In this way, I have made over £400 and, now that the complexity of the political situation affords greater scope, I shall begin all over again. It’s a type of operation that makes demands on one’s time, and it’s worth while running some risk in order to relieve the enemy of his money."

-Karl Marx, 1864.

This isn't about the RTS, but about stock ownership.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

That’s not owning the means of production of his own people. You’re altering perspective to match your system.

In the US, the wealthiest class are the oppressors. They own means of production through stock ownership or connections to Blackrock, State Street, Vanguard, etc. The middle class may have some local control in small scale, but corporate America is owned by the 1%.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The bourgeoisie are not the middle class, but the wealthiest 1%. The Petite Bourgeoisie are the middle class. The Bourgeoisie used to be the middle class until they collaborated with the proletariat and petite bourgeoisie to overthrow the aristocracy.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What nation are we talking about? That’s hardly true in the US.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's absolutely true of the US. Stock owners are also bourgeoisie.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The intention of the questions I’ve been asking was to understand your point. You didn’t answer any of them.

Also, I’m done conversing with someone who instantly has two upvotes after every comment. You clearly have a second account because being perceived as correct is so important to you.

Have fun always being right.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

No, I just stalk cowbees account.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I don't upvote my own comments, for starters. I have a Hexbear account I use for Lemmygrad.ml and Hexbear.net content, and Lemmy.ml for everything else.

Secondly, I don't understand your own point. You're trying to say the top 1% in the US aren't bourgeoisie because they own stock, not the Means of Production "directly" like in a factory of Marx's era, but that's not a determining factor for Marx's bourgeoisie. You are trying to make it so.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

If anyone wants to get higher Marx in class, I made an introductory Marxist reading list 🤓

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Facebook memes... nice.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Frankly, I think the Professional Managerial Class is more of an impediment to progress in the US. They're content with having 25-80% more than their peers, and thus will happily unite with the petite bourgeoisie to punch downwards at any progressive reforms.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The billionaires are the real problem. Targeting anyone else is just a distraction.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They are, but if you're only focused on one element, without seeing the whole picture, than any solution is temporary at best.

It's not just that billionaires are bad, their existence is a symptom of a larger broken system. And within that same broken system are millions of cogs that perpetuate and solidify the system's processes. So without addressing the Professional Managerial Class and petite bourgeoisie's complicity, the system would simply create more billionaires after enough time has passed.

To say that these other elements are "a distraction" is dismissive of larger root problems. So consider that your perspective is too narrow.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

It's not just that billionaires are bad, their existence is a symptom of a larger broken system.

Capitalism is the problem here. Billionaires (Capitalists) are not merely a symptom, they are deeply part of the root problem as they have the most power to fix things if they wanted to use their wealth for good rather than evil. I also want to point out that growing the wealth disparity with little to no regard for the damage done to society or the future is largely the entire point of capitalism.