this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
716 points (98.9% liked)

Greentext

4391 readers
1111 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 hours ago

If I did this I would immediately try to get a second job with the extra time and save like crazy.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine figuring out how to get paid for nothing, and deciding to spend your days sitting on the couch watching TV instead of going out and living life.

What a wasted opportunity.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 7 points 2 hours ago

Or find a new job so you can save the entire salary, and then send in your 2-weeks just before yearly reviews. That way you can get ahead so you have less stress when you inevitably get cut off.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

I don't get people like this. I'm currently underemployed and it's one of the worst feelings in the world. It's almost as depressing as being unemployed for me. I'd much rather be productive and have something to actually contribute instead of wasting my time and my life away.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I was in a position like this once. The first two or three months were great. TBH, I mostly played video games and cleaned the house. It felt like free money. By the six month mark, I quit to go to something else. It's surprising how mentally draining it is to just do nothing.

I think I took two things away from that experience: One, I think people generally have an innate need to produce something. We don't want to just sit around and entertain ourselves, we want to contribute. Two, I think the 40 hour work week isn't quite the right balance. Maybe 30 would be better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

One, I think ~~people generally~~ I have an innate need to produce something. ~~We~~ I don't want to just sit around and entertain ~~ourselves~~ myself, ~~we~~ I want to contribute. Two, I think the 40 hour work week isn't quite the right balance for me. Maybe 30 would be better for me.

It's good to learn from experiences, but it's not good to assume that your experience is everyone's experience.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea 2 points 2 hours ago

Eh, I have kids, so I already have enough mental drain w/o my full-time job, so I think I'd end up catching up on things I've been putting off, like exercise, repairs around the house, etc.

In fact, I lost my job at the start of COVID and didn't start looking for a few months because nobody was hiring. I got so much stuff done around the house, and I was able to essentially home-school my kids at the end of one school year and the beginning of the next. I really enjoyed that, and I would totally homeschool my kids if I didn't need to work every day to pay the bills.

So yeah, I'd absolutely appreciate a 30-ish hour work week, especially if I got one whole day off instead of it being spread across 5-days.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago

Gah, a 4-day work week would be wonderful. I might actually work on my side projects.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

Some people don't dream of, or need, labor. I know I don't. I have enough hobbies to keep me entertained forever.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago

Yeah same here.

I'm in a similar situation at the moment where my team is pretty unorganized, most employees are from an external company, and noone bothers to explain shit to me, even after I asked several times already. Plus, because of unenforced rules, it's basically 100% home office and noone is ever present, even if I go in the office. I COULD just do nothing and pretend like I'm working all of the time, noone ever contacts me anyway. But that would genuinely make me wanna die.

I'm already feeling super useless most of the time and try to chew through old legacy code to at least gain an understanding of the project. It's somewhat working, but it's tough to keep up my motivation. Overall I kinda oscillate between feeling useless and frustrated because I'm just not as productive as I would want to be as an employee.

Anyway, I'm already sending out CVs to other job offers. This is not the ideal life for me and I don't plan on keeping it going for longer than necessary.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

I think the whole "still getting enough money to survive" really makes a difference in how the unemployed see themselves

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

yeah I am the same as you. I can't respect anyone who slacks that hard

[–] 31337 18 points 12 hours ago

Happens when you're not proud of what you're contributing to. Probably most workers, tbh.

[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I've told this story a few times now, but I never get sick of it.

Back in 2011 I left a startup that got acquired. On my last day we had a Christmas Party with our parent company, and we got to speaking to one guy that was on his own. After a few drinks, he blurted out that he had worked there for maybe 12 years, but at least 5-6 of those he was "unassigned". When we asked what that meant, he said that his manager left and he was never assigned to a new team. He badged in every day, and after doing maybe 6 months of busy work and asking "wtf am I doing" to no answer from his department or HR he just came in to do his own stuff or play Unreal Tournament. He had yearly reviews with the head of department, and these were just high-level goal meetings where they reviewed the department, asked what he wanted, and left at that. Each year he was getting between a 2-5% pay rise, and outside of badging in he was only ever judged on his department output.

I always wonder what happened to that guy. The company is quite large and is still going strong, so he's probably still there. I won't name them, but another thing I loved about them was that they didn't really know where to put Software Engineers, so they just assigned them to Marketing and gave each engineer a marketing budget to personally use - around £10k each. The best part? Everyone in marketing knew it was bullshit, but they pushed everyone to spend it because otherwise their budget would go down. Some highlights were a trip to Toronto to buy some books, a full team trip to Amsterdam to go to a React conference and live in basically 5-star accommodation, and renting a hotel lobby to quickly burn some money on interviewing interns. I think they actually have a tech department now, but I know many people I worked with that stayed for close to a decade because the WLB and perks were just too good to ignore.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

2022

So, how did it go?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Long ago I worked at Wal-mart's tire center while going to college and to get as many hours as I could they let me work with the overnight people after we closed at 7. In theory. The problem was the overnight managers never got told about this so I would just hang out doing nothing for 3 hours every night and getting paid. This went on for 3 months until I got a better job and no one ever questioned me about it.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't you still feel bad about defrauding Walmart for 180 hours worth of pay?
Cause I don't.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 266 points 1 day ago (1 children)

slowly divert my work to different people in the company

So you've been promoted to a management position.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You can make fun of managers not doing work. You know what's worse than someone at manager/director level that doesn't do any work? One that insists on doing so! Trust me, first hand experience.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

I worked for basically Michael Scott at some point in my life. Everyone knew that he had the easiest job on the planet, and he still didn't do it, and we were all glad he didn't. He could talk to a room full of people for hours and explain his position in the company for so long that you forgot what you even asked.

If you think the connection to Michael Scott ends there, you'd be wrong. You would always know when he had a new girlfriend, because he would talk about her all the time. One time he connected his laptop to the projector and the first thing that opened was a picture of his girlfriend. He looked at it, said: OH. Made sure everyone saw her and then pretended to hurry to start his speech.

One day he came to work, sat in my car (i was on my way to a jobsite and had no idea why he was there.) i didn't want to talk, so i just took off. After some awkward silence, he said: i'm not even supposed to work today. I nodded, i had no idea. He asked if i knew why he's here. I said nope. He said he was supposed to get married today but his girlfriend fucked two dudes in the jacuzzi yesterday.

There are countless stories like that and all i could think about was: this guy makes 60k a year by working two days a week. And i don't mean because he was slacking off the rest, he was only employed 20%

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

The absolute worst are the micro-managers. They don’t want to do work, but they also don’t want to delegate.

Instead they opt for that limbo between, where the only “work” they do is redundant at best, and every employee under them feels like a vole being tracked by a hungry hawk.

[–] [email protected] 104 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Anon playing a dangerous game with management.

It's all well and good until they find you, figure out what you've been doing (or rather not doing), then fire you and attempt to sue you for damages.

CYA. Make at least some attempts to be noticed. If they do notice you, at least you got a little bit of easily excusable free time - if they don't, now you get the easy life AND a paper trail so they can't say "why didn't you try to tell us".

[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't know if they have much of a case to sue you, if you fall through the cracks on their own negligence. Fire you, yes. Sue, I am doubtful most larger businesses would even try. They'd rather solve the problem and sweep it under the carpet in my experience. Not USA experience of course, but still the attitude would be similar I expect.

I would worry a bit about whether they're allowed to give negative references though. Because if so, it might not be so easy to get another job after.

Best move would be to line up another job to start like a month before the review, and never reach the review stage. Even if discovered, most people that would "know" wouldn't really be driven to report anything if they're leaving anyway. The "not my problem, and this will make it my problem" attitude in big companies is real.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I think in Spain there was a legal case, but that person was paid for decades without any work. And it was also public funds, as the employer was some municipality iirk

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I looked at that. Actually I would argue that was even more negligence by the management there. I mean they couldn't even say how long he'd not been working for.

But in reality he was paid for at least 6 years of work (and they suspected more) and only fined for 1 year of pay. So, he's still a winner I think. And yes, public funds likely did help in bringing that case forward.

Most larger private businesses tend to avoid going to a court for such things unless they need to in my experience.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

I mean it's kinda embarrassing for the company to pay people to do nothing. It makes them seem a bit incompetent. I worked in a military branch where the three biggest fish of the branch got fired (maybe sued) because they hardly did anything. They would go to work, and then go on hunting trips together or shit like that. They did that for years, but they didn't really know how long. So now people obviously began to wonder what else they are doing with their money, and why no one realised that there were 3 people making an absurd amount of money for a job that is already super chill and overpaid, that didn't even do the work of one competent employee. I remember they had trouble finding replacements, so no one did their job until i left like a year or two later.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I heard many similar stories like that from friends and it's always a bit shocking to me. I'm no go getter or anything, i run my own business, but even then, i don't want to work more than i really have to. But i just really can't imagine what that must be like.

I had a friend who worked as a static engineer. He then worked for a company that made bearings for big machines, which wasn't his line of work but he liked it. The company got bought by another company who did something different and he just fell through the cracks. At first he was super anxious and just pretended to draw on his drawing board and had excel open on his computer. But no one cared, a lot of people switched jobs and suddenly he didn't really know anyone anymore and after a few month he told me that he doesn't really know what his job is.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

I’ve had jobs that amounted to sitting around waiting for work and hated it. I’m the first to tell people that I work just hard enough to not be bored and to keep everything under control

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There is no case to sue them. It's the management responsibility, not the workers to assign work. They don't need to go out seeking it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Don't worry Anon, I'm sure it'll work out.

[–] [email protected] 154 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

OP is working for a huge corporation, so slacking off and getting paid for that is ethical.

I'd go even one step further and say that slacking off is more ethical than actually working in that situation.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›