this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
251 points (97.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2654 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 108 points 3 weeks ago

“Temporary hardship” for thee, but not for me

[–] [email protected] 51 points 3 weeks ago

"Temporary difficulties" last his entire term and then he blames the Democrats, Haitians and Puerto Ricans

[–] [email protected] 43 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Temporary only if you're a rich, white, cishet man

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not at all if you're rich, and not temporary even for the rest.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Hey now, it's still temporary. The sweet release if death exists, after all

[–] [email protected] 41 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Musk went on to clarify that that temporary hardship is currently projected to last just 4 short years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

So long story short if we don't elect him we're all good

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

And if you vote Republican again in 2028, surely the hardship will be overcome in that time. Or maybe 2032 when we get there.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Holy shit, this guy has the same name as the Elon Musk who’s gotten billions in government contracts with NASA.

What are the odds? Anyway, I have an idea where we could start cutting costs. It’s only temporary while we make America great again. Again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Musk got billions or SpaceX did?

Hate on Musk all you like but the people at SpaceX are busting their ass and ultimately I think it's a good thing for the future of space flight.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

SpaceX is decades (and billions of subsidized taxpayer dollars) behind projections. They were supposed to be deploying multiple manned missions to a terraformed city/base on Mars at this point. I have friends that were employed by and have since left spacex because it degraded into more and more of an overt, disastrous shit show, unsafe working conditions, constant facetious "everyone had to work doubles through the weekends or else" memos, along with constant threats to uproot their families and move them cross country - as a tactic to indirectly lay them off for the most part.

You have absolutely no idea what the fuck you're talking about.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 weeks ago

Some of you may die, but that is a sacrifice I am willing to make

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Whereas Socialism, and even capitalism in a more grudging way, have said to people ‘I offer you a good time,’ Hitler has said to them ‘I offer you struggle, danger and death,’ and as a result a whole nation flings itself at his feet. Perhaps later on they will get sick of it and change their minds, as at the end of the last war. After a few years of slaughter and starvation ‘Greatest happiness of the greatest number’ is a good slogan, but at this moment ‘Better an end with horror than a horror without end’ is a winner. Now that we are fighting against the man who coined it, we ought not to underrate its emotional appeal.

From George Orwell's 1940 review of Mein Kampf.

https://bookmarks.reviews/george-orwells-1940-review-of-mein-kampf/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

After a few years of slaughter and starvation ‘Greatest happiness of the greatest number’ is a good slogan, but at this moment ‘Better an end with horror than a horror without end’ is a winner. Now that we are fighting against the man who coined it, we ought not to underrate its emotional appeal.

Goddamn.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Orwell goes hard. It's unfortunate that he's known for two books that people pretend they read in high school because their English teacher made them.

[–] ironhydroxide 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You know what comes before permanent hardship? "Temporary" hardship.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Just like temporary solutions turn into... you know.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago

Headline is true, he will. He will also bring permanent hardship. And for some, final hardship. Like when the mass deportations turn into mass executions.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago

What a message to try and win a tight race on. They have completely given up on optimism, it's only fear and death to their enemies.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 weeks ago

All hardship is temporary. Even if it destroys the USA

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Well sure. You think dissidents silence themselves voluntarily?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

"Temporary"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

What a cute love triangle. I wonder who's the middle. UwU

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yep, it will be temporarily hard for all of us in the camps. Do you think it will be gas again this time around? Probably, like the last time, it will be bullets until the raw anger subsides. Then efficiency experts will be called in and determine that gas is more cost effective.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago

HuffPost - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for HuffPost:

Wiki: reliable - A 2020 RfC found HuffPost staff writers fairly reliable for factual reporting on non-political topics, but notes that they may give prominence to topics that support their political bias and less prominence to, or omit, things that contradict it. HuffPost's reliability has increased since 2012; articles before 2012 are less reliable and should be treated with more caution. HuffPost uses clickbait headlines to attract attention to its articles, thus the body text of any HuffPost article is considered more reliable than its headline. See also: HuffPost (politics), HuffPost contributors.
Wiki: mixed - In the 2020 RfC, there was no consensus on HuffPost staff writers' reliability for political topics. The community considers HuffPost openly biased on American politics. There is no consensus on its reliability for international politics. See also: HuffPost (excluding politics), HuffPost contributors.
Wiki: unreliable - Until 2018, the U.S. edition of HuffPost published content written by contributors with near-zero editorial oversight. These contributors generally did not have a reputation for fact-checking, and most editors consider them highly variable in quality. Editors show consensus for treating HuffPost contributor articles as self-published sources, unless the article was written by a subject-matter expert. In 2018, HuffPost discontinued its contributor platform, but old contributor articles are still online. Check the byline to determine whether an article is written by a staff member or a "Contributor" (also referred to as an "Editorial Partner"). See also: HuffPost (excluding politics), HuffPost (politics).


MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.huffpost.com/entry/elon-musk-donald-trump-hardship_n_67211471e4b04165810ad447
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support