I think only Dragon Age Origins knew what it was.
this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
61 points (85.9% liked)
Games
16788 readers
836 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I think DA2 knew what it wanted to be, EA just decided to not let Bioware have the time or manpower to do it.
I personally think that it still has the best overarching story, environ and atmosphere in the series so far, and (controversial opinion) I LIKED that I played as Hawke. The Warden and the Inquisitor are the typical "thrown into a world changing even they have tenuous connections to", and feel a degree removed from anything but the main event sometimes.
But Hawke? They are in the thick of it. Does not matter what class Hawke is, my guy/girl is going through it at every (repeated dungeon) stage of the game. I honestly felt more for Hawke in my playthrough of DA2 than my personal avatars in Origin and Inquisition. Kirkwall sucks soooo bad, man.
The more reflection I give it the better DA2 is and the worse Inquisition is. DAO was a good turn based with pause of its era but it was 2 that was the best. My biggest problems with 2 are that it wasn’t finished (I want the Sera it was supposed to have not the one inquisition gave dammit) and Isabella’s lack of survivability/force mage just sucking. Meanwhile Inquisition fucking attempted to rehabilitate Cullen… and it had no Isabella or Merrill
You get it. I agree with all of your complaints (but another unpopular opinion, I didn't mind Sera we got lol)
Inquisition is actually my least favourite in the series, and I hate the pivot to hyperfocus on the "super special elves" and getting the most out of the story ONLY if you play a specific type of elf. I'm also not absolutely gaga for Varric (I like him, I just don't think he should be everywhere). I felt really fatigued by the end of the game tbh.
All of the characters look like they came straight outta Shrek 2.
Are they fucking high?
It looks like just another AAA slob
No it doesn't.
It's worse. It looks like a mobile game with fanfiction quality writing.
BG3 exec-bro played it well with the words.
truly knows what it wants to be could mean different things depends on how you spin it.
It knows it wants to be an AAA game in 2024, and we all know what that means...
Am I the only person who saw that dragon fight trailer or something?
The build up promised a cinematic confrontation of soldiers being thrown around and powerful siege engines to the backdrop of a ruined tower in some rolling hillside. Then it cut to a huge, grey, flat nowhere location where the player and two uninteresting specks of companion characters repeatedly hit it with christmas tree lights until it had a stoke and died.
Maybe Dragon Age wants to be a game about shooting Christmas lights at ~~bullet~~ Christmas light sponges?
Tbh, I don't mind not having flashy combat scenes if the actual RPG is well done.
A lot people are liking it because the people who didn't during the early preview didn't receive their early access copies.
I’ve only seen Skill-Up review but it looks like this guy assumes BioWare is toast and won’t be sending many early copies in the future. I’m confused at who’s the target audience of this game. Is it the League of Legenda crowd? It kinda looks like Arcane now that I think about it. Low hardware requirements also suggest it’s aimed at younger players but I can’t reconcile it with how dorky it is.
Curious to see where this one lands with people.
Just guessing, but maybe a 6.4 / 10 customer score. More copies sold than Concord, but not enough to go net positive. It looks polished so I doubt it'll be overwhelmingly negative, but it just won't be that interesting to gamers so most will probably just not buy it.
It'll probably be review bombed in both directions.
I'm feeling a mixed reception obviously. Probably more review bombing in the negative direction by the Gamer™ crowd perceiving it as woke.
Dragon Age want from a RPG to an action game with some light RPG elements. So they want to be shit. Okay got it.
I'll check it out when it comes on gamepass
Do we have to humanize and anthropomorphize everything? We have ship girls. Gun girls. All kinds of girls. Do we really need sentient video games as "waifu's" and "husbando's"? Also side note. Is animal crossing a guy? And does he know what he wants? I assume based on the pronoun of "it" that dragon age veilguard is probably nonbinary.
But didn't the woke ruined it by inserting politic (aka women, pronouns, non-whites, etc.) in it? /s
I get what you mean but this kind of stuff is just infantile:
It's all insultingly preachy and puerile, apart from taking me right out of the setting. GTA didn't make me a serial killer, this whiny shit won't make anyone a decent person.
Oh the exec speaks.... 100% true then. /s