this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
127 points (96.4% liked)

Linguistics Humor

1130 readers
2 users here now

Do you like languages and linguistics ? Here is for having fun about it


Share this community: [[email protected]](/c/[email protected])


Serious Linguistics community: [email protected]


Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

analogous structures like these helped me break down the false barrier in my mind about men and women being fundamentally different as if the two reproductive castes are monoliths. they aren't. they are staggeringly similar. Especially mind-blowing was learning that the default structure is what we classify as "female".

Every mammalian fetus starts development along the female bodyplan, and unless acted upon by the external impulses of a y-chromosome, the mammal's bodyplan will continue to develop in a way that appears entirely female, EVEN IF the y-chromosome is actually present.

Such as: If it's there but it doesn't work (if it's malformed or partially missing), or if it's there AND it works but the REST of the cells aren't responding to the androgens. Turns out the X "set" contains all the instructions needed to make a sentient being, even if it's very likely that this being will not be capable of reproduction through traditional means.

The point is, everything you can point to on the male anatomy, all those tissues exist in the female anatomy, they're just distributed differently. And that's freaking cool.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Very cool, but it's annoying the horse's hoof is covered over, and this isn't really linguistics.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not quite the same image, but similar gist.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Nice! So apparently horses are all flipping us off constantly.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Meanwhile, about half of a cat’s hind leg is what in humans would be the foot.

[–] ZombiFrancis 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, why do they gotta be backwards?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Pitt the Eldernate

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Thanks, I hate whale fingers

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

So can whales move their massive phalanges independently?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Haha, very humerus!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Bears who are heel strikers like humans, unlike cats, dogs and many others animals, have eerily familiar looking back leg structure

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

humans aren't really heel strikers, go run barefoot and you'll realize why.

turns out slamming your heel into the ground hurts, what we use the heel for is standing on it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Walking humans and bears definitely heel strike. I'm not talking about running.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

even then we don't put our weight on the heel first (unless we're wearing terrible modern shoes that force us to do so), we put weight on the heel and forefoot approximately at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

I have been to the real world a couple of times and having seen some people stomp like crazy, I can 100% say you cannot generalize like that.