this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
387 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19090 readers
5157 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 hours ago

I can get a two dollar raise...

Well it's better than the FUCKING CONCENTRATION CAMP I'd get from the other guy

[–] [email protected] 19 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

$15/hr works out to be about 30k/yr. That's not enough to live on. We need a $30 minimum wage. It needs to be indexed to both inflation as well as congressional salary. If they get a raise, everyone gets a raise.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

Yeah that fight for 15 was in 2016. We are way past that fight needs to be fucking 25 to 30. But watch every single fucking Republican will vote against any increases of minimum wage. 7.25 is a fucking joke and law makers should be fucking ashame of themselves.

Actually any of them vote no on a raise should have all their money seized and made to live on minimum wage for 5 years.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Doubling the federal minimum wage would be $14.0 not $15

[–] [email protected] 14 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Good!

Now also link it to yearly inflation annually in December!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 30 minutes ago

The number needs to be set to a good value, but this is the most frustrating aspects of this whole song and dance because there shouldn't even be a question about whether it should track inflation. Just setting another flat value so we can watch it atrophy away is maddening. The whole concept is directly related to the cost of goods, and the people needing this wage are the most impacted by price changes. And since it's supposed to be a floor, you know minimum wage employers aren't going to voluntarily raise wages to track inflation. They'd be paying even less if they were allowed.

Even if the businesses-first majority of politicians try to low-ball the target, there's no legitimate argument for not making it auto-update. Businesses just like to reap the extra exploitation between updates.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 21 hours ago

fight for 15 years late

[–] [email protected] 18 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Name a more iconic duo than politicians and making promises that rely on the cooperation of other branches of government.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Not voting in enough Democrats into Congress to do anything and saying the Democrats didn’t actually want to do anything

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago

Politicians being bought and sold to the highest bidder of the campaign trail.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 22 hours ago

If the house and Senate approve. She can't just do it on her own

[–] [email protected] 9 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

This was literally her supposed signature issue when she was running with Biden.

She didn’t fight for it at all.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Whaaaaat??

A politician making a bunch of claims right before an election and then never following through on them?

Say it ain't so! Not in my America!

Yeah it's lying season. Both sides are telling us what they think we want to hear.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

This election does seem a little weird. Kamala feels like more of the same but Tim walz is right, Trump and his supporters are really kind of weird and creepy.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 23 hours ago

I believe all promises that are made within the last 30 days of an election!

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Wait, doubling it -to- 15 dollars an hour? Holy shit, I knew it was bad, but that is insane. Ours is already starting to feel too low at 17.40 here in Canada, granted that is about the equivalent of around $12.50 USD. So it's lower than what she is proposing, maybe if she manages it, we'll be able to get ours up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

It'd only put the US at 5th in the world for minimum wage, which considering the cost of living in the US vs most other countries.

[–] Huckledebuck 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, the states have been moving towards 15, but the national minimum wage has been stuck for a few decades. And also yes, 15 is already way too low.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Even the McDonalds around here know that even the most desperate laugh at 7.25 an hour

[–] [email protected] 7 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The last place I worked upped their minimum wage to $10 an hour. It certainly wasn't because of benevolence or federal shifts...they slowly realized that when you pay the absolute minimum, you only attract the minimum talent, and most of those positions had very high turnover rates that were costing the company more than it'd be to just raise the starting pay rates.

It was cheaper to pay those positions more money.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 18 hours ago

Unfortunately in my state where the minimum wage is higher than the federal, many service industry companies refuse to learn that lesson. Or they think 16 cents above minimum wage is enough to attract top tier talent.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Most states have their own minimum wage laws at this point. Not all of them. So this will help a handful of mostly-red states.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And note that her wording was "at least $15", so she's signaling openness to doing more than that

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 day ago

Good, because "fight for $15" has been going on so long that the real number to regain parity with what minimum wage used to be is a lot higher than that by now.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

$15.05 an hour! Increasing at a rate of 11 cents per year from the current minimum of $7.25 Except tipped workers; they still get $2.13.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago

Surely we'll get it this time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

I doubt many people make anywhere close to minimum, but no excuse not to raise it!

5-years ago? Yep, we had tons of clients paying rock bottom, or close enough. I'm not in the payroll business anymore, but the jobs my wife was looking at as a preschool teacher were $12+, and that job always pays shit. Walmart and Target start at $15, or more.

All this is a small town where you would expect small wages. I was in Manhattan in 1992 and was astounded at the prices. Ask my native friend how people survived on minimum wage. He looked at me funny and laughed, "Dude. No one gets minimum wage. $10 is as low as it goes."

Good news on one of those shit paying clients! They were really hurting and the new CEO turned everything around in a couple of years. At that time, they started paying $12, paying benefits and paying for education.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 minutes ago

I doubt many people make anywhere close to minimum, but no excuse not to raise it!

That's in fact one of the best reasons to raise it as it's a clear indicator it's failing to perform its purpose. We know the are exploitative employers who will pay as low as they possibly can and nothing has changed in our economy or country to suggest that the market now naturally provides a baseline living wage, so it rarely being in effect is a big flashing red sign that it's woefully out of date.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Economies work from the bottom up and never the top down. The more money people have, the more money they can spend, and thus the more goods and services they can buy, and thus the more demand there is, and thus the more supply there will be.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 20 hours ago

This has been my argument for years. If you want a strong economy have a strong middle class...they're the ones with the disposable income.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I'll believe it when I see it. Seems every candidate has promised this for as long as I've been following American politics and no one actually manages it.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Oh.

My minded automatically corrected that as "doubling from 15 to 30". Because that's what it needs to be, at least.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

That's great!

Certain burger-flipping former presidents have legal fees to pay and this goes a LONG way to making due.

load more comments
view more: next ›