this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
176 points (90.7% liked)

politics

18651 readers
3612 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 123 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The GOP is too extreme

  • On abortion
  • On guns
  • On tax cuts for the wealthy
  • On race
  • On LGBTQ issues
  • On climate change
  • On unions
  • On the environment
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It would be shorter to list the items they're not too extreme on.

I'll let you know when I think of one...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Currently: support for Ukraine.

Though they’re slowly pivoting to their natural position of bending over for authoritarian dictators.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They're extremely against supporting Ukraine

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Don't forget human rights.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The right played the long game so well to end Roe and then immediately blew it by validating every terrifying prediction pro-choice folks had made about what would happen without it. Three generations of voters now view reproduction rights as a core issue for the first time because of these jackasses. I hope it burns them for many elections to come.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The dog finally caught the car and didn’t know what the fuck to do with it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

the dog hit the side of the car and is currently underneath the car, how much it gets banged up underneath is to be seen. could end up roadkill but could miraculously come out mostly fine, hopefully not.

[–] cloudy1999 32 points 1 year ago

Nonsense. If there's one thing we've learned from Republicans about Republicans, it's that there's no such thing as being Republican enough.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

they don’t give a shit about the people this will affect; they’re just abusing a wedge issue to win elections. it’s all about manipulation and power.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

they’re just abusing a wedge issue to win elections

Which isn't working anymore, hence the pivot from Hannity. We have only hope for the good of the country and the world they lose a lot more in the future

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

With the overturning of Roe it is now a wedge issue against them.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Has he been water boarded yet?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Ya think, Sean? Ya think?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Of course they would double down, it’s the Republican way. These are sad pathetic people.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Don't give this dude any clicks. Downvote this post. Literally ignore this loser.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Downvote this post.

No. You upvote to acknowledge OP's effort, not because you agree with the content of the article.

You comment to express your opinion.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. That's what you do. Everyone else is free to use their up/down votes as they choose.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

And that person is still telling everyone to do the opposite of what you suggest. So go tell them this exact thing too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

What? No.

You vote based on the quality of the submission. This is a content aggregation service, the goal is to ensure good quality content rises and bad is hidden.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Considering this article from a left wing site that regularly calls out his bullshit, I think it's fine

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hannity. He's as much of a right wing propagandist as Tucker Carlson

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think it is wrong for people seeing that they were in the wrong: so long as they are taking the steps to acknowledge they were part of that problem.

Though, in reality, Hannity just sees the monster they just woke up. These results will be a pretty good indication of what the presidential election will be like.

57% of a state is a severe disadvantage at the best of times, when you don't have a candidate with 2 indictments against him for election fraud and 1 for rape.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think it is wrong for people seeing that they were in the wrong: so long as they are taking the steps to acknowledge they were part of that problem.

I would agree, but that's not what's happening here.

The problem with Hannity, with Carlson and with so many other conservative pundits, is that while they wave the American flag and claim to pledge allegiance to it, their actions see them put American Conservatism over America itself. And they do this consistently.

Hannity is addressing a smaller, much more localised symptom to avoid addressing the real problem: that American Conservatism isn't reflecting the will of the people and subjugates more people to unnecessary suffering than it helps, by a long shot.

American Conservatism needs a complete fucking overhaul, not some piecemeal we-need-to-lighten-up speech.